Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

With Sue as our model, we will keep on fighting back against attacks on the largest source of insurance for children’s mental health treatment in the nation (Medicaid), and renewed efforts by people up to the Secretary of HHS to stigmatize folks with mental illness and behavior health challenges.
As Executive Director of NAMI Minnesota she passed laws to require mental health training for teachers, expand crisis and early intervention services, strengthen how insurance companies cover mental health care. As Sue retires from leading NAMI, we owe her a huge debt of gratitude.
I am still thinking about the atrocity of the attacks last weekend in Boulder. The rise of antisemitic violence across this country is unmistakable and unacceptable, and we all need to strongly stand against it.
Progress isn’t always a straight line, but I have to believe America will one day protect all our neighbors under law. That’s what brings me hope this month. Happy Pride.
RFK Jr. not knowing how to cite research and just making shit up as he goes is… not that surprising. Mind boggling that four Republicans couldn’t grow a spine and block this guy. Now look where we are.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says his "Make America Healthy Again" Commission report harnesses "gold-standard" science, citing more than 500 studies and other sources to back up its claims. Those citations, though, are rife with errors, from broken links to misstated
conclusions. Seven of the cited sources don't appear to exist
at all.
A lot of Minnesotans struggle to keep up with how fast technology is changing – so we have programs to help teach them. It helps them land good-paying jobs and keep up with the day-to-day tasks that we use technology for. DOGE just cancelled these programs.
Thinking of the countless American lives lost and the thousands of brave men and women who answered the call of our nation with great courage and honor. Memorial Day and all days we thank those who made the ultimate sacrifice to protect our freedoms and keep us safe 🇺🇸
James Baldwin said, “not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed unless it is faced.” Today, I’m inspired by the strength of the young leaders I see here in Minnesota who refuse to give in, give up or forget. I’m with them.
Big corporations that embraced Black businesses and a more diverse workforce only a year ago have erased those efforts as they shamefully kowtow to Trump and MAGA. So, there have been retreats and losses also.
Only a fool would look at how Donald Trump lifted up White Afrikaners as the victims of genocide and see anything but the race baiting and racism that it is.
It is also true that across our nation the number of police killings continues to go up, and the people who are dying are much more likely to be Native, Black and Latino people.
Donald Trump’s Justice Department has abandoned the Consent Decree, but we will not. Congress has failed so far to pass the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, but local communities like mine have banned no-knock warrants and the use of choke holds.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-53)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →