Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Kevin Ray Hern is an American politician and businessman from Oklahoma. A Republican, he is serving as a member of the United States House of Representatives for Oklahoma's 1st congressional district since 2018.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes77%
No20%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 16 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Normally when a policy has winners and losers you hear from both sides, but in this case it feels like the winners are at best silent and at worst still actively furious
"Wage compression" is discussed as a negative; service price inflation is discussed as a negative; and there's absolutely nothing from people better off due to an incredibly clear policy impact
Weird thing: the UK minimum wage has risen against inflation for years. It's now really high. Millions of people are earning more than they were as a direct result of this policy. And the impact on the vibes of the country is… entirely absent?
Registering my objection to this flagrant cheating I want to note that I’m “43 miles away” with guess number 2 and will now proceed to lose
[galaxy brain meme] • scansion is about more than counting syllables • there's not even a consistent definition of what a syllable is • failure has three syllables
The MCU remains so great for this. “All religions are provably true except the abrahamic ones. This shouldn’t affect anyone’s outlook on life right?”
Adding JBM as the honorary fifth tweet in the thread bsky.app/profile/jbur...
Worth noting: • Upward revision applies to entire 2021-2024 series — the *trend* in emigration is *roughly* flat • As infuriating as big revisions are, they mean data is getting better • BUT wild that we ever used a survey to gauge movements into and out of the country instead of counting people!
To give the ONS some credit, part of the reason they suck at this is because the British state has decided it's not its job to monitor who leaves the country, for some reason
it's not even the basic question of "can you get British net migration figures correct to within a single order of magnitude", it's also all the implicit secondary questions which are wildly important. Who's leaving? Where for? Why?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-15H.R. 8469 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 8365 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 5625 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H. Con. Res. 75 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-14H.R. 6260 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1259 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1251 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Con. Res. 96 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2026-05-13H.R. 1346 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1252 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1274 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-05-13H. Res. 1275 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2853 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-05-12H.R. 2071 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30S. 4465 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNOAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-04-30H.R. 7567 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-30S. Con. Res. 33 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-29S. 1318 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-29H. Res. 1224 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 227 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-27H.R. 7959 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 11Next →