Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 567
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 73 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

There are always a handful of disappointing/surprising Oscar omissions, and I'm sad that Paul Mescal got squeezed out for a superb performance in Hamnet. But: Delroy Lindo and Wunmi Mosaku! Four for The Secret Agent, including casting! Amy Madigan! Yeah, this list is fine.
It basically did! The structure of the class was that we would watch one significant film a week on Monday at 1 and then again at 7 that night, and 2-3 other significant related films once each during that week. It was one of the best educational experiences of my life.
I think there's a pretty easily detectable difference between a laugh that feels weird or inappropriate but is real, and a kind of running stream of audible performative disdain that is designed to bullhorn your superiority to or detachment from what you're watching.
Yep. I saw The Best Years of Our Lives as a teenager, in a classroom full of college students (including me) who were not prepared to take what it had to give. But we had a great professor who talked us through that reaction, then had us watch it a second time.
The opposite of what I'm talking about isn't "reverent silence"; it's an awareness that you're in a public space. I think an easy test is: Am I genuinely reacting, or am I inflicting my negative opinion on strangers in real time? If the latter, why do you feel a need to be heard at that moment?
Bad laughter feeds on itself. Contempt for art or perspectives that feel alien thirsts for validation from the people next to you. I get the argument that we're all entitled to our own reactions, but actually, no. Not when they're so loud and performative that they cut into the experience of others.
To the justifiable discourse about how the repertory cinema experience is degraded by the smirky laughter of filmgoers who don't know how to process their own discomfort, all I can add is that if you're in a theater with a group of college kids who have been ASSIGNED to see a movie, brace yourself.>
I put this through Google Translate and it said, "The stock market dropped and I have no meaningful support for this anywhere so, basically, I lost, and nobody should ask me about this anymore."
Trump: "Based upon a very productive meeting I had with Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region. This solution, if consummated, will be a great one... Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs"
Based upon a very productive meeting that I have had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region. This solution, if consummated, will be a great one for the United States of America, and all NATO Nations. Based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the Tariffs that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st. Additional discussions are being held concerning The Golden Dome as it pertains to Greenland. Further information will be made available as discussions progress. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and various others, as needed, will be responsible for the negotiations — They will report directly to me. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
"Snubbed." JFC. I cannot believe that my years spent dissecting the single stupidest part of Oscar-nomination culture is going to qualify me as an expert on how World War III started.
Mike Johnson accuses Norway of “making a political decision & not awarding the Nobel Prize to probably the most deserving individual in history of the prize. There are 8 to 10 wars & conflicts that’ve been resolved by President Trump, & he got snubbed.” (Vid via Manu Raju on X)
If Schumer were ONLY the party's midterm strategist--and if he managed a win--many Democrats would grit their teeth and say, I don't like him but he got us the majority. But he's also the Senator who should be mobilizing opposition re ICE and Greenland. And it is cataclysmic to fail in that duty.
One problem Democrats face is that the job of chief electoral strategist (Schumer) is increasingly incompatible with being party leader (also Schumer). Both roles matter, but if you can't use your platform as leader to say what's right because you're too into the game, you don't belong in the job. >
We have an entire class of Democratic "leadership" that has been told that it's dangerous and extreme to say this, and that does not understand that what Democrats want is for their leaders to articulate what they believe and why they believe it. That should not be as big an ask as it apparently is.
Mamdani: "I am in support of abolishing ICE. What we see is an entity that has no interest in fulfilling its stated reason to exist. We're seeing a government agency that is supposed to be enforcing some kind of immigration law, but instead what it's doing is terrorizing people."
This is what happens when you succumb to the pervasiveness of "It's cringe" culture--the idea that you cannot possibly live with discomfort without expressing audible hostility.
My honest belief is that they have both fallen so in love with their image of themselves as master election strategists that they have forgotten that they were elected to represent people and to argue for and against things. Also, thanks for your brilliant writing!
When I try to reply to a gmail now, I get an automatic "Do you need help writing?" cue. No, I do not, and kindly fuck off into the sun. Is there a way to turn this off?
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
567 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournYESYESPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-05H.R. 7744 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Con. Res. 38 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-03-05H. Res. 1099 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1100 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H.R. 6472 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-04S. 723 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-04H. Res. 1095 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-25H.R. 4758 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H.R. 4626 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-24H. Res. 1075 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-24S. 2503 (119th)Fast-track passageYESNOFailed
2026-02-24H.R. 6329 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-12H.R. 2189 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11S. 1383 (119th)Motion to CommitNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 261 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 72 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H.R. 3617 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1057 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2026-02-11H. Res. 1042 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-02-10H.R. 1531 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 12Next →