Sara Jacobs headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 51
Born
February 1, 1989
Age 37
Phone
(202) 225-2040
Office
2348 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 51

Sara Jacobs

Sara Josephine Jacobs is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative for California's 51st congressional district since 2023, previously representing the 53rd congressional district from 2021 to 2023. Her district includes central and eastern portions of San Diego, as well as eastern suburbs such as El Cajon, La Mesa, Spring Valley, and Lemon Grove. A member of the Democratic Party, she is the youngest member of California's congressional delegation. She is the Caucus Leadership Representative, making her the youngest member of the Democratic House leadership.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 535
Yes40%
No59%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 51

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sara Jacobs headshot
Sara Jacobs
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 51
SoupScore
Sara's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 136 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Food insecurity is rising in all 50 states, and yet the Senate’s budget bill would enact the biggest cut to SNAP ever. It would cut food assistance for: ❌Veterans ❌People who are homeless ❌Youth aging out of foster care ❌Stay-at-home parents
I had a great time celebrating Juneteenth last week at Chollas Lake! There were amazing local vendors, music, activities, and history. Even in these dark times, the joy and resilience of our community in San Diego shine through.
I was happy to join the long-running Cooper Family Foundation’s Juneteenth Celebration last weekend! The best antidote to the authoritarian attacks we’re facing is to build community, find strength in our diversity, and learn from our history.
On process, this ruling also makes it so much harder to undo any future unconstitutional actions by the president – basically, it will take a class action lawsuit in order to get broad relief across the country.
No vote. No passport. No equal protection. Limited due process. A safety net yanked away. That’s the human cost of eliminating birthright citizenship. It would forever change who feels like they can belong, participate, and be protected here.
If President Trump ever managed to derail that promise, it would create a new sub-class of millions of people who were born here in the United States, but don’t have the same rights and benefits of citizenship.
The Supreme Court just released its opinion in the birthright citizenship case. Here’s the big takeaway: the Court tightened the rules on when a single judge can issue a nationwide injunction, instead of deciding the fate of birthright citizenship. That’s still a big problem.
Thank you to Teamsters Local 542 for inviting me to the National Teamsters Hispanic Caucus biannual convention. Unions have always been on the side of the people – fighting back against inequality, corporate power, and authoritarianism. Proud to stand with you.
I visited Includ(Ed) to see their amazing work reimagining inclusive early childhood education. Children with disabilities, like all children, deserve access to affordable, high-quality care. I'm proudly fighting for federal funding to help make that possible.
I met with NATCA at the Lindbergh Air Traffic Control Tower to discuss solutions to critical, nationwide staffing shortages. I fully support funding for controller hiring, retention, and training, and I’ll keep pushing for smart, sustained staffing investments.
This ruling paves the way for states to kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid – putting THEIR beliefs above YOUR health care. Here’s what that means: -More undetected cancers -More untested STIs -More challenges to getting birth control -More preventable deaths
Republicans in Congress want to kick MILLIONS of people off their health care – including many people with disabilities. I visited Home of Guiding Hands, which provides a wide range of critical services to disabled folks in our region, to hear how Medicaid cuts would impact them.
Image of 3 people smiling - Rep. Sara Jacobs in the middle. A sign in the background reads (in part): "HGH Home of Guiding Hands"
Rep. Sara Jacobs stands behind a podium and addresses a seated audience indoors. About 7 people visible in photo.
3 years ago, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. We’ve seen the horror that’s caused – people dying in ERs, parking lots, and at home because they can’t get an abortion. Abortion is health care, and I won’t stop fighting until it’s legal, affordable, and accessible for all.
I’m glad that President Trump isn’t escalating further and I hope this ceasefire holds – but that doesn’t change the fact that bombing Iran was reckless, unconstitutional, and hurts U.S. credibility to negotiate a permanent, verifiable deal.
Beating, pepper-spraying, and then kidnapping a father of three Marines shouldn’t be in ICE’s job description. President Trump and Secretary Noem have let ICE run rogue – we need to rein them in.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
535 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 11Next →