Andy Kim headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
July 12, 1982
Age 43
Phone
(202) 224-4744
Office
520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Andy Kim

Andrew Kim is an American politician and former diplomat serving as the junior United States senator from New Jersey since 2024. A member of the Democratic Party, he served from 2019 to 2024 as the U.S. representative from New Jersey's 3rd congressional district.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes30%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Andy Kim headshot
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 33 sponsored · 237 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Now a VIRTUAL event! Please join me for a virtual Veterans' Town Hall on Saturday, November 8th at 10am. This isn't one of our regular town halls; this is a chance for you to hear directly from NJ veterans about their service and ask them questions. 1/2
Trump’s tariffs have been nothing short of a disaster for American families. Higher grocery, gas, rent, healthcare, and utility prices — the average household can’t afford this.   It’s time we put a stop to these tariffs and focus on lowering costs across the board.
Rent or groceries. Medicine or gas. Education or healthcare. Right now, families face an impossible choice because of the healthcare crisis that Trump and Congressional Republicans have created. It’s way past time for them to come back to work and end this shutdown.
In the wake of the Trump Administration's federal funding freezes, targeted budget cuts, and broader attacks aimed at the nonprofit sector, our office is hosting a webinar about non-federal funding streams for nonprofits on Friday, November 14th from 12-1pm. 1/2
1 in 8 people rely on SNAP.

You know something's wrong when in the richest, most powerful country in the world, the President is refusing to fund SNAP and instead, actively weaponizing people's hunger.
 
It's immoral. It's cruel. And it must come to an end.
Thank you Mary, Pamela, and Leslie for your acts of service.   As Trump and House Republicans abandon Americans and let people go hungry, these New Jerseyans represent the care communities have for each other. We must follow their example.
Diane is a New Jersey resident whose healthcare is more than doubling. It's unacceptable that so many people are facing the hard decision about whether they can afford to keep their healthcare, take their kids to the doctor when they're sick, or pay for a health emergency.
SNAP is essential for over 40 million Americans. Trump was just fine with them going hungry. The President should do everything in his power to make sure SNAP is fully, not just partially, funded.
Week 6 of the shutdown and we want solutions – not images of Trump's Halloween party or an empty House chamber.   People are missing paychecks, losing healthcare, and struggling to feed their families.   It's time Republicans get back to Washington and do their jobs.
While 827,000 New Jerseyans worried about their SNAP benefits this weekend, Trump threw a Gatsby party at Mar-a-Lago for his billionaire buddies. That makes me pretty angry. How about you?
Tommy has a right to be mad. He deserves better than astronomically high healthcare costs for worse coverage. It’s time the House showed up to work so we can do better by the millions of people like Tommy.
Higher deductibles, higher out of pocket, and higher premiums. As a cancer survivor, Jeanette from Union, NJ can’t skip doctor visits. These increased rates have put her in an impossible spot.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16