So many of us rely on nursing homes to take care of our parents and grandparents. I can relate to this and I know many of you can, too.
I’m heartbroken that this is what Republicans are pushing in favor of tax cuts for the richest among us, and I’m going to do everything I can to stop it.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 830
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 240 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted bySenator Andy Kim
Republicans’ newest version of their Big Bad Budget bill cuts $100 billion MORE from Medicaid than the original.
It’s not just cruel, it makes no sense.
But this fight isn’t over. Keep making your voice heard, and together we’ll do everything we can to kill this bill.
The opposite of courage is cowardice.
The courage of your voices can defeat the cowardice of their attempts to take Americans’ healthcare away so they can give handouts to billionaires.
Keep engaging. Together we can make courage win the day.
Republicans are prioritizing over $1 trillion in cuts that will close hospitals, strip millions of their healthcare, and take away food assistance, all to give tax breaks to people in this country who are wealthy enough to have their own space programs.
It’s past midnight at the Capitol, and the Republicans are pushing forward their dangerous reconciliation bill. We are making sure that every single word of this bill is read, so that the American people understand just how harmful it is.
Will Republicans have the courage to protect the lives of the people they represent? Or, will they strip away health care, food assistance, and close hospitals, all to give tax breaks to billionaires?
Thank you for your questions and your engagement as the fight continues.
By rejecting this resolution, my colleagues are abdicating our responsibility to give voice to Americans, including the military families who will inevitably be put in harm’s way. 3/3
Does he try to strike if Iran seeks to rebuild the sites or build new nuclear facilities?
The American people deserve to know under what conditions Trump would consider additional strikes and to have a say in whether our country goes to war. 2/3
Despite the strikes, Iran still appears to maintain significant uranium stockpiles, and continues to pose a threat. Does President Trump order strikes again if Iran digs out the nuclear sites and tries to enrich uranium stockpiles? 1/3
My parents came to this country 50 years ago in awe of what America stood for. Stories like our family’s are what makes our country a beacon of hope and opportunity, and not something a single president’s Executive Order should ever be able to override. 2/2
No President, including Donald Trump, has the power to unilaterally change our constitution and strip away the birthright citizenship defined within it.
Today's decision is not the end of the road. 1/2
The approach Trump took on Iran was not comprehensive or strategic, and that’s dangerous to the American people.
Here’s what you need to know about how the Trump administration is falling short.
The freedom to choose the care provider right for you should be non-negotiable. We can't sit back and take anything for granted as Republicans' attacks on reproductive health care go further and further.
Today's absurd decision again stresses the need for nation-wide protections by Congress.
In New Jersey, 1 in 7 kids struggles from hunger.
Here are 3 things I learned after touring the Norwescap food bank in Phillipsburg, NJ, and how the Republicans' proposed cuts will take food away from millions of Americans.
I continue to stand with the LGBTQ+ community, and I'll continue to fight for the rights and freedoms of every American. 3/3
As we celebrate the LGBTQ+ community, we also recognize the threat that our LGTBQ+ neighbors face today, as the Trump Administration tries to take away protections, programs, and essential freedoms. 2/3
Today, we honor the 10 year anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage. 1/3
President Trump discredited his own intelligence community's assessment of the Iran strikes and ordered a reduction of intel sharing with Congress.
The American people deserve answers and accountability. I'll be asking for that today.
Medicaid cuts don't discriminate by party. They'll impact families of Democrats, Republicans, and unaffiliated voters equally.
They're taking away everyone's healthcare, food security, & chance at an education, just so they can pay for billionaire tax cuts.
We will continue to stand in their way.
It was an honor to meet with Mira, the NJ Senate Page in the summer page program. Mira gives me hope in the next generation of young leaders. I'm grateful for her candid questions, and our conversation about how we move forward in service of a stronger democracy for all.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History830 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
830 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.