At a Glance

Seat

Representative for California District 49

Born

October 28, 1978

Age 47

Phone

(202) 225-3906

Office

2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 534

Yes44%

No54%

Present1%

Not Voting1%

Party align97%

Cross-party3%

SoupScore

District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @RepMikeLevin Facebook Instagram YouTube

External Resources

Wikipedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Mike Levin

U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49

SoupScore

Mike's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 92 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

I woke up very early this morning to news of “major combat operations” in Iran. My prayers are with our service members and their families. The President didn’t make the case or come to Congress. We took an oath to defend the Constitution. It’s time for a War Powers vote.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

This page from June 25 of last year is still live on the White House website. www.whitehouse.gov/articles/202...

Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News

The world is far safer after President Donald J. Trump’s highly successful, decisive precision strikes against the Iranian regime’s key nuclear

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

This page from June 25 of last year is still live on the White House website. www.whitehouse.gov/articles/202...

Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News

The world is far safer after President Donald J. Trump’s highly successful, decisive precision strikes against the Iranian regime’s key nuclear

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

This leaked draft executive order is completely illegal and unconstitutional. If Trump and Congressional Republicans do not immediately distance themselves from this outline for an executive power grab over our elections, it is a five-alarm constitutional crisis.

Exclusive: Read the draft executive emergency order for Trump to take control of elections

Lawyers and legal experts explicitly said that such an order is blatantly unconstitutional.

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

This draft attempts to dictate how ballots are printed, how voters register, how votes are cast and counted, and how results are certified. That is legislative power that belongs to Congress and the states, not the executive branch.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

The President enforces the law, he doesn’t get to rewrite it. This entire draft is unlawful, unconstitutional, and fundamentally incompatible with our system of government. Maybe it was written by the MyPillow guy or perhaps John Eastman?

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

The president cannot seize control of federal elections, nullify acts of Congress, and suspend constitutional protections by declaring a “national emergency.”

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 28(source)

Exclusive: Read the draft executive emergency order for Trump to take control of elections

Lawyers and legal experts explicitly said that such an order is blatantly unconstitutional.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

If you’re going to haul political opponents before Congress, you’d better be willing to follow the facts wherever they lead. The American people can see the double standard. And they deserve better than a cover up.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Why was Hillary Clinton dragged in to testify about Jeffrey Epstein rather than Donald Trump, whose name appears in the Epstein Files more than 38,000 times?

Hillary Clinton tells House panel she 'had no idea' of Epstein's crimes

The ex-secretary of state called for President Trump to be questioned under oath about his past association with the sex offender.

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

No president should be making billions off the presidency. No member of Congress should be trading stocks on inside information. Period.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Not a day-trading platform. Not a billion-dollar branding opportunity. If we want people to believe in democracy again, we start by proving that no one is here to cash in. Let’s get it done.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

I have supported a ban on stock trading in Congress for seven years. It is one of the few issues that genuinely brings Democrats and Republicans together. Public office is a public trust.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

No president should be making billions off the presidency. No member of Congress should be trading stocks on inside information. Period.

Reposted byMike Levin

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Pete Hegseth is once again demonstrating that he’s dangerously unfit to lead the Pentagon.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Red lines of no mass domestic surveillance and no autonomous weapons without human control are necessary and reasonable. Yet Hegseth’s response is coercion, jeopardizing both innovation and our security. When even the AI company that stands to benefit says to pump the brakes, we must listen.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Instead of building consensus on how to responsibly integrate AI into our national defense, he’s threatening an American AI company with an ultimatum: abandon its ethics rules or be cut off, labeled a supply chain risk, or even forced into compliance.

Mike Levin@mikelevin.orgFeb 27(source)

Pete Hegseth is once again demonstrating that he’s dangerously unfit to lead the Pentagon.

← Newer postsPosts page 33Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(24)

H.R. 7942 (119th)
To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit the listing of contracts relating to war, de…
H.R. 7879 (119th)
To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Se…
H.R. 7598 (119th)
To amend title 38, United States Code, to refund the amount of fees for a housing loans guar…
H.R. 7543 (119th)
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate certain li…
H.R. 7398 (119th)
To amend the Passport Act of 1920 to exempt from the collection of certain passport fees of …

Cosponsored Bills(92)

H.R. 8852 (119th)
To amend the Public Health Service Act to direct the Director of the National Institutes of …
Joined: 2026-05-15
H. Res. 1291 (119th)
Expressing support for the recognition of May 3 through May 9, 2026, as Wildfire Preparednes…
Joined: 2026-05-14
H.R. 8450 (119th)
To require a pilot program to enhance existing efforts to mitigate vessel impacts on large c…
Joined: 2026-04-22
H.R. 8421 (119th)
To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend to former members of the Armed Forces, disc…
Joined: 2026-04-21
H.R. 8099 (119th)
To require the Secretary of the Interior to annually submit to Congress, and make publicly a…
Joined: 2026-03-26

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

534 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.R. 4553 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-09-04	H.J. Res. 105 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-04	H.J. Res. 106 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-04	H.J. Res. 104 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-03	H. Res. 539 (119th)	Kill the motion	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-03	H. Res. 672 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-03	H. Res. 672 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-09-02	H.R. 747 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-09-02	H.R. 4216 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-23	H.R. 4275 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-23	H.R. 3357 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-22	H.R. 1917 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-22	H.R. 3937 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-21	H.R. 3351 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-21	H.R. 3095 (119th)	Fast-track passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Send back to committee	YES	YES	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H.R. 4016 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-18	H. Res. 590 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-18	H. Res. 590 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-17	H.R. 1919 (119th)	Final passage	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-17	S. 1582 (119th)	Final passage	YES	NO	✕↔	Passed
2025-07-17	H.R. 3633 (119th)	Final passage	YES	NO	✕↔	Passed
2025-07-17	H. Res. 580 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-16	H. Res. 580 (119th)	Motion to Reconsider	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-15	H.R. 1717 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-15	H. Res. 580 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Failed
2025-07-15	H. Res. 580 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-14	S. 1596 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-14	H.R. 1770 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-14	H.R. 1709 (119th)	Fast-track passage	YES	YES	✓	Passed
2025-07-03	H.R. 1 (119th)	Accept Senate changes	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-03	H. Res. 566 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-03	H. Res. 566 (119th)	Approve amendment	NO	NO	✓	Agreed to
2025-07-02	H. Res. 566 (119th)	End debate now	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-07-02	H. Res. 566 (119th)	Consideration of the Resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed
2025-06-27	H. Res. 516 (119th)	Approve resolution	NO	NO	✓	Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 11Next →