All but three House Republicans voted to protect those tariffs and protect Trump. They chose party loyalty over your paycheck.
But joined by three Republicans, we stopped them in a 217–214 vote.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
It’s worth briefly explaining what happened with a vote in the House late last night, because it’s significant:
Mike Johnson and House Republican leaders tried to keep blocking Congress from voting on whether to roll back Trump’s tariffs on countries like Canada.
Stephen Miller isn’t just advising Trump.
He’s running the show.
From reckless ICE raids to impossible arrest quotas to silencing anyone who urges restraint, Miller is the shadow president.
He’s setting the agenda, shaping the cruelty, and driving the chaos. www.bbc.com/news/article...
Reposted byMike Levin
Six of my colleagues in Congress, all veterans, told service members a basic truth: you never have to follow an illegal order. That’s settled law and part of their oath.
Yet Trump’s Justice Department somehow tried to turn that into a crime.
This case never should have been brought. It was political retaliation, and completely disgraceful. www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
Fortunately, a grand jury rejected it altogether.
That’s because reminding service members to follow the Constitution and their oath is not sedition.
It’s patriotism.
Six of my colleagues in Congress, all veterans, told service members a basic truth: you never have to follow an illegal order. That’s settled law and part of their oath.
Yet Trump’s Justice Department somehow tried to turn that into a crime.
Reposted byMike Levin
Reposted byMike Levin
New research shows Trump’s tariffs quietly cost the average family about $1,000 last year, rising to $1,300 this year if they stay in place.
That’s a hidden tax on groceries, cars, and everyday goods. #TrumpflationSucks
While the White House talks tough on trade, families are paying the bill, and most of the promised economic gains are being wiped out.
New research shows Trump’s tariffs quietly cost the average family about $1,000 last year, rising to $1,300 this year if they stay in place.
That’s a hidden tax on groceries, cars, and everyday goods. #TrumpflationSucks
Reposted byMike Levin
Justice must not depend on wealth, connections, or political power.
Reposted byMike Levin
In cases involving exploitation and abuse, our system must stand firmly with victims, not protect the privileged.
Reposted byMike Levin
The Epstein survivors are right to demand the truth about why Ghislaine Maxwell received leniency and was moved to a low-security facility.
In cases involving exploitation and abuse, our system must stand firmly with victims, not protect the privileged.
Justice must not depend on wealth, connections, or political power.
The Epstein survivors are right to demand the truth about why Ghislaine Maxwell received leniency and was moved to a low-security facility.
Reposted byMike Levin
A new Cato Institute study underscores that working immigrants have been a massive net positive to our economy for decades.
Not only are Trump’s policies cruel, they’re also really dumb.
www.cato.org/blog/cato-st...
Reposted byMike Levin
This is your reminder: Washington Republicans gutted Medicaid and Medicare to fund massive tax breaks for billionaires last summer.
The worst impacts of their bill were delayed—but that was intentional.
When the pain comes, I’m sure they will try to dodge accountability, but we won’t forget.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12