This is a practical, common-sense step to strengthen our democracy for the long run.
Let’s build momentum and get it done.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Nearly every state uses some form of term limits or reappointment for their highest courts. It strengthens the system without politicizing it.
Lifetime appointments give individuals extraordinary power for far too long. Term limits don’t weaken the Court. They modernize it and make it accountable.
This reform keeps the Court independent. Justices would still serve with distinction, then continue contributing as senior judges, the same way it already works across much of the federal judiciary.
I’m proud to cosponsor a bill to set 18-year term limits for Supreme Court justices.
An 18-year term, with one new Justice appointed every two years, will bring balance and predictability. No more strategic retirements. Just a steady, fair process that restores trust.
Families are getting squeezed while the president insists we’re living in a golden age.
He’s grading a fantasy he makes up as he goes.
Trump says the economy gets an A+++++ because prices are “falling everywhere.”
I don’t know what country he’s living in, but it’s not the one the rest of us buy groceries in.
Even Fox News spent the week reporting rising prices.
What this report shows is that even citizens can no longer rely on that promise, based solely on how they look.
I think about my grandfather, Rosendo Bringas, who came here from Mexico as a boy and became a citizen at age 50. He worked his whole life for the protection and stability that citizenship promised.
Anyone who cares about public safety should be alarmed.
Wrongly detaining citizens is reckless government overreach. It wastes resources on people who pose no threat and erodes trust in the agencies that actually keep us safe.
Senate investigators interviewed people who were dragged from cars, threatened with guns, denied medical care, and held for days without access to a lawyer. Some of the victims were children. All were Americans. And the administration still claims it never occurs.
ProPublica has uncovered something the Trump administration keeps insisting never happens.
Immigration agents have detained and mistreated American citizens. Not one or two isolated mistakes.
More than 170 citizens this year.
www.propublica.org/article/immi...
Mace is right about something else. The House is currently restrictive and ineffective, led by people without Pelosi’s skill or discipline.
If Mace truly wants a Congress that gets things done, she knows where the governing coalition is. She should switch parties and work with us.
Now look at the House today under Deputy Speaker Mike Johnson.
The contrast couldn't be sharper.
Groveling to the president (who is the real Speaker these days) and constant scrambling. Even McCarthy showed far more leadership when he worked with Democrats to keep the government funded and open.
Pelosi is one of my political heroes and the most effective Speaker in history. I saw as she kept us united through the toughest moments, and we passed big legislation as a result.
Nancy Mace wrote recently in The NY Times, “Here’s a hard truth Republicans don’t want to hear: Nancy Pelosi was a more effective House speaker than any Republican this century.”
I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Trump’s big “affordability” speech made one point.
He isn’t serious about affordability. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
The House Republican Armed Services Committee chair says the Hegseth boat-strike probe is “done.”
But key questions remain unanswered, and the 2nd video Trump promised is nowhere to be found.
Americans deserve full accountability. It's Congress’ duty to provide it.
We're not letting this go.
Reposted byMike Levin
This is why coastal communities have spoken with one voice for years. No one here wants this.
And I will not stop until the job is done. www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/12/09/c...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12