It’s the same playbook as Helsinki, when Trump stood next to Putin and dismissed clear findings of Russian election interference.
This isn’t just embarrassing on the world stage.
It’s dangerous.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 566
Yes45%
No53%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 94 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump did it again.
Today, he publicly took MBS’ side over his own intelligence community, even though our agencies unanimously concluded that MBS approved the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.
Translation so you don't have to read Trump’s rant:
he doesn’t give a damn about Epstein’s survivors.
He only cares about deflecting from the truth, protecting abusers, and persecuting his political enemies.
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump has fought release of the Epstein Files for years and now may use a new DOJ probe as a smokescreen to stall them again.
Here’s the truth: he could release the files RIGHT NOW.
If he wanted them out, they would already be out. time.com/7334450/epst...
Trump has fought release of the Epstein Files for years and now may use a new DOJ probe as a smokescreen to stall them again.
Here’s the truth: he could release the files RIGHT NOW.
If he wanted them out, they would already be out. time.com/7334450/epst...
Maybe the Epstein Files were all in the East Wing?
Reposted byMike Levin
Just a reminder that Trump already has the power to release the Epstein Files right now, this minute.
They’re already under subpoena by the House Oversight Committee, so don’t fall for Trump’s claim that he wants full transparency.
He’s been fighting against it for many years.
Just a reminder that Trump already has the power to release the Epstein Files right now, this minute.
They’re already under subpoena by the House Oversight Committee, so don’t fall for Trump’s claim that he wants full transparency.
He’s been fighting against it for many years.
Reposted byMike Levin
Nothing says serious national emergency like staging a $220M cowboy glamour shoot at Mount Rushmore while your friends quietly cash the checks.
www.propublica.org/article/kris...
Nothing says serious national emergency like staging a $220M cowboy glamour shoot at Mount Rushmore while your friends quietly cash the checks.
www.propublica.org/article/kris...
Trump spent the last year driving up grocery prices with broad tariffs, then suddenly scrapped them and claimed he’s “lowering costs.”
He’s the arsonist showing up with a bucket of water after setting the fire. apnews.com/article/trum...
Trump told Laura Ingraham that the American people “don’t have certain talents.” A President saying his own country isn’t talented.
Can you imagine the total Republican freak out if Obama had said that?
Trump keeps pretending the economy feels fine, but families know better. Prices are up, debt is rising, and his policies are making it worse. When people ask for relief, he offers excuses and finger-pointing. His promises always sound good until real life proves them false.
The People’s House?
Reposted byMike Levin
Washington Republicans have spent over a decade attacking the Affordable Care Act, voting over 70 times to gut the ACA, slash Medicaid, and pushing junk “Trumpcare” that is nothing more than concepts of a plan.
They continue to block us from lowering premiums and protecting coverage. All to keep their tax cuts for billionaires.
#StopRepublicanPremiumHikes
Washington Republicans have spent over a decade attacking the Affordable Care Act, voting over 70 times to gut the ACA, slash Medicaid, and pushing junk “Trumpcare” that is nothing more than concepts of a plan.
The Trump administration can afford $40 BILLION to bail out Argentina and $2 BILLION for Hegseth to rename the Department of Defense.
But making sure Americans can afford healthcare?
Too wasteful, according to every person who voted for Trump’s spending bill.
#StopRepublicanPremiumHikes
I’ll never stop fighting for the constituents who sent me to Congress, and I’ll keep using every tool I have to make life better for working American families while exposing corruption and calling out lies.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History566 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
566 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12