Greg Landsman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Ohio District 1
Born
December 4, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-2216
Office
2244 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Ohio District 1

Greg Landsman

Gregory John Landsman is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative from Ohio's 1st congressional district since 2023. The district is based in Cincinnati, and includes most of its inner suburbs.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 566
Yes48%
No50%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align93%
Cross-party7%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Greg Landsman headshot
Greg Landsman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOhio District 1
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 27 sponsored · 138 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump and Republicans want to give more than $4 trillion in tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy and they’re planning to pay for it by gutting nearly $1 trillion from Medicaid. On today’s Democratic Daily Download, @repgreglandsman.bsky.social breaks down the math and what it will mean for Americans ⬇️
Outside our office in DC is a portrait of Arnise Thrasher, a mom from Cleveland who died after giving birth. Her story is tragic and far too common. Black women are 3x more likely to die from pregnancy-related causes. It has to change. We’re working to make sure all moms get the care they deserve.
There may very well be people in Trump’s orbit feeding him Russian propaganda. He uses language so similar to Kremlin talking points. He appointed people with known ties to Russia and Russian propaganda…. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn...
You may have missed this, but it could be one of the most significant stories of the year. A big beneficiary of Trump’s chaos is Putin— from our trade wars to abandoning our allies. Here’s just how compromised we could be 🧵👇🏼 www.npr.org/2025/04/15/n...
Our team will be in Price Hill next Tuesday, April 22, for mobile office hours. If you need help navigating Social Security, IRS returns, immigration, or veterans’ benefits—we’re here to help. 🕚 11 AM – 3 PM 📍 970 Purcell Ave, Cincinnati, OH ➡️ RSVP: www.eventbrite.com/e/price-hill...
They believe that misinformation and lies about Social Security will create an environment where they can make these cuts.   That brings us back to why J.D. Vance’s comment is so terrifying. 40M seniors rely on Social Security for half of their income. Any changes to this system will hurt people.
2) They're in the process of eliminating phone verification.   At first, they forced seniors – who might not be able to get a ride or drive – to physically go into a field office. And it’s an office they’re likely going to close.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
566 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12