
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 37 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We're literally seeing grandma's retirement seized to build sports stadiums.
If you're recruiting folks from the Stars Wars Cantina, you're gonna have a hard time running the country. www.youtube.com/shorts/kTc0-...
$1.5 billion was invested within 14 minutes of a Presidential announcement. The SEC said nothing.
Once or twice is a remarkable coincidence, five times in a single month is racketeering.
Congratulations Stanford's Men’s Gymnastics for winning the National Collegiate Championship. Our athletes delivered an exceptional performance and extended Stanford’s unprecedented 50-year NCAA championship streak, the longest in college athletics. Fear the Tree!! 🌲
The good news for Congressman Lawler's constituents is nothing enables them to forget the painful impact of Trump's tariffs, like $4 a gallon gas, and it's only going to go up.
Happy Earth Day! Let’s Save Willy!
Sam’s note: Okay, yes, I’m aware that (a) the photo is corny, and (b) Willy was an orca whale, but my comms team is on fire, so I’m going with it….
Hollywood freed Willy. Now it’s on us to protect him.
Nearly 1 in 5 gray whales that enter the Bay die. The Save Willy Act will protect these magnificent creatures and help mariners avoid costly, harrowing collisions. Together, we can Save Willy.
I’m proud to partner with Rep. Young Kim on the bipartisan PACE Act, to modernize our financial payments system for the benefit of millions of cash-strapped Americans.
We can reduce the burden of fees borne by too many American families by enabling broader access to innovative payment systems that deliver cheaper, faster, more reliable service.
If you're visiting Washington, check out my website so we can help you with tours, and to make the most out of your trip: liccardo.house.gov/services/was...
It’s been great to have so many constituents visit our nation’s Capitol; last week, it was my pleasure to welcome the Yuen family from Mountain View.
ICYMI: I introduced a bipartisan bill with Rep. Mike Lawler to stop the government-sponsored cash grabs that victimize too many older Americans. As we discuss here on CBS, states shouldn’t steal grandma’s hard-earned savings to build sports stadiums.
Great to see a familiar friend, Dr. Cynthia Teniente-Mattson, in D.C. We are lucky to have her leadership as SJSU’s President, as well as students (and future leaders) like Ma'Kayla and Katelyn, who joined her in Washington to advocate for funding for Pell Grants and research.
SJSU fuels Silicon Valley’s progress with more engineering and computer science grads than any other university.
“We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Mother Night
www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Great meeting with veterans, active servicemembers, and reservists at Moffett Field for a discussion about the cost-of-living challenges facing our veteran and military families.
We also discussed the war in Iran, and Pope Leo’s call to choose peace. Can’t wait to see where they go next.
Great to huddle with 7th graders from St. Raymond’s School in Menlo Park during their visit to Washington. Credit to their teachers—these middle schoolers showed up ready with sharp questions about AI’s impact on jobs and education.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.