Patty Murray headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Washington
Born
October 11, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-2621
Office
154 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Washington

Patty Murray

Patricia Lynn Murray is an American politician who has served as the senior U.S. senator from Washington since 1993. A member of the Democratic Party, she held the position of president pro tempore of the Senate from 2023 to 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 830
Yes25%
No69%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Patty Murray headshot
Patty Murray
U.S. SenatorDemocratWashington
SoupScore
Patty's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 35 sponsored · 167 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The question before Congress right now is about life and death issues: Will hospitals stay open? Can kids stay on their health care?   OR are billionaires like Elon going to get trillions in tax cuts—at their expense? Not a hard question. I know my answer—I'm with families.
Great to hike on Cle Elum Ridge with @nature.org to discuss the importance of federal investments for forest restoration and protection. Protecting our natural resources has to be a top priority. In the Senate, I'll be fighting back against ANY proposed cuts to funding for our public lands.
As Trump fires vets, cancer researchers & so many others, his administration is encouraging agencies to ignore HR recs and pay Trump political appointees the max salary—nearly $200k. Padding loyal operatives' pockets while decimating basic services. I'm demanding accountability.
My family relied on food stamps briefly when I was a kid—our country had our back, and all 7 of us kids grew up to give back to our communities.   Investing in nutrition assistance? Investing in SNAP? That’s an investment in people, and cutting SNAP won't help anyone.
We should NOT cut food assistance in America so that Trump can pad the pockets of billionaires and giant corporations. If Republicans won’t listen to common sense and common decency—then we are going to get a megaphone and shout it from the rooftops: HANDS OFF SNAP.
I'll be a broken record on this: The GOP tax bill puts tax breaks for billionaires over health care for millions. Premiums will skyrocket for middle-class families. Working people—and CHILDREN—will lose health care. Hospitals will close. We've got to stop them. Help spread the word.
Right now, Republicans are trying to kick millions off Medicaid and spike your premiums. But remember: we stopped Republicans from repealing the ACA in 2017. I stood with @cantwell.senate.gov to say: Now is the time to get loud and speak out. NO CUTS TO MEDICAID!
We should NOT cut food assistance in America so that Trump can pad the pockets of billionaires and giant corporations. If Republicans won’t listen to common sense and common decency—then we are going to get a megaphone and shout it from the rooftops: HANDS OFF SNAP.
Guess what: because of how badly the GOP tax bill would blow up the national debt, it would eventually trigger a budget law that would force $535 BILLION in cuts to Medicare. It’s downright criminal. They’re slashing Medicare through the back door to cut taxes for billionaires.
Today, on Memorial Day, we remember the cost of war and the sacrifices our military families make.   I hope friends and neighbors in every part of WA take a moment to reflect on those sacrifices. I'll always work to honor our fallen servicemembers through my work in the Senate.
"One Big Beautiful Bill Act" is a stupid name.   But more importantly, it will kick millions of Americans off their health care, including CHILDREN, it will spike premiums, and explode our national debt.   It's a raw deal for middle-class Americans and a huge giveaway to billionaires.
More than a week later, and still NO answer from RFK Jr. This is alarming. How many NIH clinical staff have been fired? How is that impacting patient care? This information is not meant to be secret.
MURRAY: How many staff have been cut from the NIH's clinical center? I want a specific number RFK Jr: I can't tell you that MURRAY: That's not acceptable
Good morning.   The minute the Republican tax bill arrives in the Senate, it should promptly be thrown in the trash.   No way to Medicaid cuts. No way to kicking kids off their health care. No way to pushing seniors out of nursing homes.
An anti-abortion group that helped write Project 2025 puts out junk science on mifepristone—and now the Trump administration is calling for a "complete review." Trump's FDA is laying the groundwork to rip away access to medication abortion. We can't be quiet about it.
I explain to FDA Commisioner Makary: when it comes to food & drug safety, it's downright dangerous to mass fire 1 in 5 people, then frantically rehire some—only because you couldn't think for 2 seconds if these jobs were actually important. Oh, and I'm tearing up Trump's budget proposal.
Horrified at the murder of two young Israeli embassy aides last night at the Capital Jewish Museum. We must all condemn this kind of violence & antisemitism in the strongest possible terms. Hate has no place in America. My thoughts are with the victims and their loved ones.
House Republicans don't want you to know they just passed a bill that makes health care MORE expensive and kicks MILLIONS off Medicaid, all to pass tax cuts for billionaires & giant corporations. We need to make sure America knows. And we need to kill this bill in the Senate.
While Trump's tariffs explode costs, his new tax bill will also make health care & groceries more expensive for millions, all to pass tax cuts for billionaires. Worse health care so billionaires can pad their pockets? Every Member of Congress should vote NO on this scam bill.
My message to Energy Secretary Chris Wright: Your budget cuts BILLIONS from research to manufacturing, and it will RAISE energy bills. With Trump's budget, the only energy we are going to save is from the lights that go out at factories across the country. Congress should rip this budget up.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
830 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 17Next →