We fought tirelessly to deliver for them, and we did. Now, the ACA is a pillar for tens of millions of Americans.
Since day one, Trump and Republicans have tried to dismantle and sabotage the ACA. [2/3]
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 7
Doris O. Matsui
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 7
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Doris O. Matsui
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 7
SoupScore
Doris O.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 98 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
16yrs ago today, the Affordable Care Act became law—built on the simple but powerful belief that health care is a right, not a privilege.
The fight for the ACA was for people with pre-existing conditions, young adults aging off their parents’ plans, and those being priced out of care. [1/3]
Instead of prioritizing Americans here at home, he's prioritized subverting Congress and the rule of law at every turn.
The American people and our troops should not be asked to shoulder the burden of this rogue administration’s mistakes. [2/2]
Trump’s illegal war in Iran is already costing the American people too much—now he’s asking for an additional $200 billion in funding. That alone would more than cover all of the SNAP cuts in his Big Ugly Bill. [1/2]
As Ranking Member of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, I won’t let the Administration weaponize broadband funding to bully states out of enforcing their AI laws. That’s why my colleagues and I are introducing the GUARDRAILS Act to stop this overreach and protect the public. [2/2]
Through Trump’s AI Executive Order and now National AI Policy Framework, the administration has been bending over backwards to strip states of the ability to enact commonsense AI safeguards—all while there are no meaningful federal protections in place. [1/2]
Let’s be clear about what this is and what it is not. This is not a serious effort to support local news or address the challenges posed by Big Tech. This is about handing power to a few massive corporations at the expense of local voices—the very voices that hold power accountable. [2/2]
The approval of the Nexstar-Tegna merger is an outrageous abuse of authority. It throws out limits designed to protect local journalism and viewpoint diversity. It hands Nexstar Media Group, a single conglomerate, unprecedented control over what millions of Americans see and hear. [1/2]
I fully support AG Bonta's lawsuit to block a Nexstar TEGNA merger. Allowing it would mean rewarding corruption, less competition, weaker local news, and higher costs for consumers. We can't allow Trump even more power to silence local stories and voices.
AG Pam Bondi has done infinitely more to circumvent Congress than she has to deliver justice for the victims of Jeffery Epstein and his accomplices. Pam Bondi is making a mockery of our Justice Department and needs to resign.
When an FCC Chair threatens broadcasters for reporting facts and targets broadcasters that anger the President, every American should pay attention. This is bigger than one network or one story. It is an attempt to silence scrutiny, shape coverage through fear, and erode a free press.
I believe women, and I stand with those who have had the courage to speak out.
No movement can remain strong without accountability. Our commitment is to the truth, to farmworkers, and to ensuring that these values are upheld without exception. [2/2]
The farmworker movement has always stood for dignity, justice, and the protection of the most vulnerable. That mission must guide us now.
The allegations of abuse by Cesar Chavez that have come forward are deeply painful. We must listen to survivors with humility and compassion. [1/2]
To keep America the leader in wireless innovation, we need to be proactive in our preparations for the next generation of networks.
The U.S. needs to play a leading role in setting international 6G standards. This means:
➡️A plan for the diverse range of 6G uses
➡️Strengthening the supply chain and protect against cybersecurity threats
➡️Ensuring federal agencies are coordinating on how to leverage 6G and promote adoption
That’s why I’m working to ensure the innovations of today strengthen our economy, protect our security, and improve people’s lives tomorrow. [2/2]
Today I joined @politico.com for a conversation on the future of our wireless communications networks.
6G will transform how we connect with each other and the world around us. The economic and national security stakes in the global race to lead this technology couldn’t be higher. [1/2]
Behind the scenes today recording a weather emergency preparedness PSA with the one and only @jimcantore.bsky.social!
No luck required when you’re prepared.
Happy St. Patrick’s Day 🍀
More long-distance power lines connecting California with the plains and south would bring cheap clean wind power to California in exchange for our abundant solar power.
It's a win-win for the climate, lowering utility bills, and increasing national grid resilience during dangerous weather events.
We have the solutions to reduce power plant pollution and keep the lights on, and we're pioneering it in California.
While the east coast faced a deadly winter storm, California had plentiful solar power. [1/2]
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-10 | H.R. 3838 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-09 | H. Res. 682 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3425 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-08 | H.R. 3424 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.