Jerrold Nadler headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for New York District 12
Born
June 13, 1947
Age 79
Phone
(202) 225-5635
Office
2132 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New York District 12

Jerrold Nadler

Voting Record — 592
Yes38%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting10%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 12

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jerrold Nadler headshot
Jerrold Nadler
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew York District 12
SoupScore
Jerrold's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 163 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I call on my colleagues to join me and cosponsor HR 3045 in the wake of this terrible tragedy, in hopes that one day such violence will cease, and Israelis and Palestinians can live together in peace, security, and stability through a negotiated and viable two-state solution.
This bill codifies and enshrines into law the Biden Administration’s Executive Order 14115, which sought to prevent these kind of acts of violence in the West Bank and to punish all those who commit such acts in the West Bank, regardless of their nationality.
I am horrified by the brutal murder of 20‑year‑old Palestinian‑American Sayfollah Musallet by Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Reports that the settlers prevented ambulances from reaching the victims and IDF soldiers were also present but failed to intervene are deeply disturbing.
I’m grateful to these public servants for their service to our country. Donald Trump and Marco Rubio should be ashamed of themselves for gutting our diplomatic corps, endangering national security, and treating our civil servants as disposable.
WASHINGTON (AP) - State Department is firing over 1,300 career diplomats and civil servants under Trump administration plan, official says. @apnews.com
This comes on top of Republicans’ recently passed One Big Ugly Bill, which makes repaying student loans even harder. Nobody should face crushing debt simply to earn a degree—but Republicans are slamming the door on our students’ futures.
Trump’s Department of Education has quietly ordered student loan companies to restart charging interest for nearly 8 million borrowers, adding $27 billion to student debt in just one year.
Black women are paid just 64 cents for every dollar paid to white men, costing them nearly a million dollars over their lifetime. Now, attacks on federal jobs — one of the few reliable paths to the middle class — threaten to widen that gap even further.
Six months in, congestion pricing is working and it’s more popular than ever. ✅ Less traffic ✅ Safer streets ✅ Cleaner air ✅ More transit riders ✅ New MTA funding I’m proud to have fought to make this a reality for decades. Now New Yorkers are seeing the benefits every day.
As Dean of the New York Congressional Delegation, I am once again urging my Republican colleagues from New York to reject this bill before it devastates our state’s health care system and rips coverage away from 1.5 million New Yorkers.
Yesterday, a community hospital in southwest Nebraska announced it will close a clinic, citing the looming Medicaid cuts in this bill. Sadly, if it becomes law, that closure will be just the beginning.
Dear Reps. LaLota, Garbarino, Malliotakis, Lawler, Stefanik, Langworthy, and Tenney: The Senate version made this bill even worse for New York hospitals and patients, slashing funding, capping key payments, and hitting our providers the hardest.
Voting for a bill that devastates their own districts and abandons the people they were elected to serve would be the ultimate betrayal of the trust that New Yorkers placed in them.
It would rip health care away from 1.5 million New Yorkers and gut food assistance benefits for over 300,000 families. It also puts 70 New York hospitals at severe risk of closure.
As the Dean of the New York Congressional Delegation, I proudly stood alongside my fellow New York Democrats to urge our Republican colleagues to find the courage to stand up for New Yorkers and oppose this cruel bill.
House Republicans could pass her bill tomorrow with bipartisan support. Instead, they buried a band-aid version of it inside the biggest rollback of health coverage in American history.
And in Trump's terrible bill, the tax relief for tipped workers expires in four years, while the tax cuts for billionaires are made permanent. Senator Rosen’s No Tax on Tips Act, which passed the Senate unanimously in May, would deliver permanent relief to tipped workers.
AOC: "On this point of tax on tips, as one of the only people in this body who has lived off of tips, I want to tell you a little bit about the scam ... the cap on that is $25,000 while you're jacking up taxes on people who make less than $50,000 across the US ... while kicking them off the ACA."
Let’s be honest: Once this bill passes, Republicans are not going to reverse or delay these cruel Medicaid cuts. If you have a chance to protect your constituents from losing their health care coverage, the time to act is now.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
592 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →