Jacky Rosen headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
August 2, 1957
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-6244
Office
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Jacky Rosen

Jacklyn Sheryl Rosen is an American politician serving as the junior United States senator from Nevada since 2019. A member of the Democratic Party, she was the U.S. representative for Nevada's 3rd congressional district from 2017 to 2019.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes37%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align89%
Cross-party11%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Jacky Rosen headshot
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 60 sponsored · 217 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Nevada’s law enforcement officers do incredible work to keep our communities safe. I’ll always work across party lines to make sure our police officers have the resources and support they need to do their jobs.
Being able to work hard and afford a nice place to live is a cornerstone of the American Dream.   But right now, it’s out of reach for too many.   Congress needs to help level the playing field for hardworking families, including by cracking down on those jacking up housing prices.
It’s incomprehensible that the Admin is withholding critical federal funding to fight the fentanyl crisis in Nevada and all across the nation.   The fentanyl crisis is destroying communities, and we can’t play politics with overdose prevention. The Trump Admin must release this funding ASAP.
Nevada families work hard, play by the rules, and deserve to have a chance to get ahead. But they’re still seeing high costs at the grocery store that are squeezing their budgets. (1/2)
Trump promised he would bring prices down on “Day One.” Instead, his reckless tariffs are making hardworking families pay more for essentials like groceries and gas. He has basically imposed a new tax on families. edition.cnn.com/2025/07/15/e...
Last year, more than 500 Nevadans died from heat-related illnesses in Clark County alone. I’m introducing a bill to classify extreme heat as a major disaster, allowing our communities to access the federal funding they need to keep people safe.
They’re happy to add trillions to the national debt to give billionaires more tax breaks, but will cut critical programs for hardworking families when given the chance. (2/2)
Senate Republicans passed an extreme bill in the dead of night to slash funding for public broadcasting – cutting off a critical source of local news and emergency alerts for rural NV communities. (1/2)
Senate Republicans’ extreme bill will defund global health programs and strip away essential family planning services from women around the world, and tens of thousands of women will die as a result. (1/2)
But now they’re trying to defund public radio and TV, which will force stations in rural and Tribal communities to shut down. This will cut off a vital source of news and emergency alerts for hard-to-reach communities. I’m voting NO. (2/2)
I’m helping introduce a bill to ensure immigration enforcement officers properly identify themselves and uphold the same transparency we expect from any other law enforcement official. (2/2)
Designating Creech AFB as a remote and isolated installation which provides additional funding for morale, welfare, and recreation activities, and medical services such as dental, to support Airmen and their families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESNOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16