Charles E. Schumer headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New York
Born
November 23, 1950
Age 75
Phone
(202) 224-6542
Office
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New York

Charles E. Schumer

Charles Ellis Schumer is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New York, a seat he has held since 1999. A member of the Democratic Party, he has led the Senate Democratic Caucus since 2017 and served as Senate Majority Leader from 2021 to 2025. He has served two stints as Senate minority leader, from 2017 to 2021 and since 2025. He became New York's senior senator in 2001, upon Daniel Patrick Moynihan's retirement. Elected to a fifth term in 2022, Schumer surpassed Moynihan and Jacob K. Javits as the longest-serving U.S. senator from New York. He is the dean of New York's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 789
Yes27%
No73%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Charles E. Schumer headshot
Charles E. Schumer
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew York
SoupScore
Charles E.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 154 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

A shutdown would give Donald Trump the keys to the city, state, and country. Musk has said he wants a shutdown, and reporting has shown he is already making plans to use the shutdown to expedite his destruction of key government programs and services.
A shutdown would give Donald Trump and Elon Musk carte blanche to destroy vital government services at a significantly faster rate than they can right now.
The cruelty of the richest man in the world telling tens of millions of seniors that he wants to “eliminate” their Social Security That their checks are part of one big scam Elon Musk is clueless about what it means to rely on that check to buy food and medicine Democrats are fighting for seniors
Trump promised America a "Golden Age" on Day 1 It's Day 50, where is it? Inflation is up The stock market plunged Pure chaos, no stability, total confusion All thanks to Trump's tariffs to pay for tax cuts for billionaires We won't stop fighting to stop these harmful tariffs
Elon Musk confirmed it. Republicans are getting ready to gut Social Security and Medicare. Republicans know that the math on their billionaire tax cuts won't work without going after benefits that working Americans have earned. Democrats will fight for you. youtube.com/shorts/Aly7s...
“So that’s the big one to eliminate” The richest man on Earth yet again claimed that Social Security and Medicare are riddled with fraud and abuse. He's lying. We won't let him take away the benefits that tens of millions of Americans have earned. youtu.be/v_OPcz4u210?...
Instead of dealing with the real problem, like the Chinese Communist Party cheating & flooding the global market with cheap steel Trump goes after Canada We'll keep fighting back on these ridiculous tariffs that are driving up prices & hurting Americans www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
Today is #InternationalWomensDay, and today and every day, we celebrate and honor women. We tell the stories of incredible women who have fought for equality and blazed a trail. We fight side-by-side for equality and women’s rights.
Trump’s plan to abolish the Department of Education is devastating. Public schools are the bedrock of our country. They're the foundation on which we build the American Dream. Democrats are fighting for our kids and their future.
Senator Schumer speaks at a press conference with Senators Sanders Murphy, Murray, and Peters on the Department of Education, March 6, 2025.
As antisemitism continues to surge around the world since October 7th: The Trump administration hired a top Pentagon official with a history of antisemitic conspiracy theories and extremism. It’s outrageous, and Secretary Hegseth must fire her now. www.npr.org/2025/03/06/n...
I’m breaking down why Donald Trump and Linda McMahon’s attempt to shutter the Department of Education will hurt our kids. You’re going to want to watch this. Democrats will never stop fighting for our kids.
Whatever Trump and Republicans in Congress say Here are the facts—The GOP budget goals mean they’re going to slash Medicaid or Medicare. And all to give tax cuts to their billionaires’ club. Democrats will never stop fighting for Medicaid and Medicare. www.washingtonpost.com/business/202...
The acting head of Social Security admits it: DOGE is calling the shots and taking away Social Security benefits. Firing Social Security staff and closing offices means people lose benefits. We'll keep fighting to protect Social Security. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
This right here is why every single Democrat said “hell no” to the nomination of Linda McMahon. Linda McMahon is an Education Secretary who personifies nails on the chalk board. Democrats are fighting for our kids’ education. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/06/u...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16