Join our Telephone #TownHall next Wednesday, Feb 11 at 7 PM to update you on the key fights underway in Washington — Trump’s reckless policies, holding #ICE accountable & more.
@cd4losangeles.bsky.social will join as our special guest
Dial ➡️ 818-214-8555
RSVP ➡️ BradSherman.house.gov/RSVP
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 129 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
(2/2) Learn More ➡️ sherman.house.gov/media-center...
I’m proud to have secured over $12 million in new federal funding, now signed into law, to address vital needs across the San Fernando Valley and parts of the Westside — from strengthening fire stations to improving parks, bolstering infrastructure, and other critical priorities. (1/2)
Reposted byCongressman Brad Sherman
Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California's new election map
I pressed Trump's Treasury Secretary on whether taxpayer dollars could be used to bail out Bitcoin or force banks to buy crypto.
I challenged #Trump’s Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent today on the administration’s economic policies — including their claim that tariffs don’t raise prices.
Watch ⤵️
Reposted byCongressman Brad Sherman
Noem and DHS are out of control.
OUT NOW!
Today I voted NO on the government funding bill because it included funding for #ICE
#ICEOut #ICEOutNow
Honored to attend the India Association of Los Angeles #RepublicDay celebration alongside the first-ever Consul General of India in Los Angeles, Dr. K.J. Srinivasa.
The evening reflected the enduring friendship and vital partnership between #India and the United States.
Pleased to meet with Armenian Parliament Member Lilit Galstyan and discuss efforts to strengthen the U.S. – #Armenia relationship.
One more reason Bovino should be fired.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/31/u...
Yesterday and today, in Woodland Hills and Studio City, neighbors, families, clergy, seniors, students — a whole community refusing to be silent on #ICE brutality.
#WoodlandHillsIndivisibles
#StudioCityRising
#WoodlandHillsNoKings
#ICEOut
#JusticeNow #JusticeForGood #JusticeForPretti
Took to the streets with my Valley neighbors to stand up for our rights against #ICE — an out-of-control organization that has terrorized communities, has lost the public’s trust and must be held accountable.
#Indivisible #FightFascismFriday #NoKings
I stood with UNAC/UHCP nurses and health care workers at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Woodland Hills as they raise critical concerns about staffing and patient care.
Frontline caregivers play a critical role in our health system, and their voices matter.
#SafeStaffingSavesLives
I joined Bloomberg News to discuss Kevin Warsh’s appointment as Chair of the #federalreserve and made it clear: Warsh must pledge to protect the Fed’s independence and withstand pressure from #Trump
Watch ⤵️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXw7...
Spent an incredibly moving evening with Omer Wenkert, who described his 505 days as a hostage of Hamas.
There was not a dry eye in the room as Omer removed the yellow ribbon, symbolizing the return of the last #Israeli hostage.
Proud to lead the effort alongside Rep. Claudia Tenney to tell the EU it’s well past time to sanction the #IRGC.
As the brave #Iranian people continue to fight for their freedom from the Islamic Republic, the world must stand with them completely & unequivocally – including by sanctioning the #IRGC, whose Basij militia continues to murder thousands of Iranian protesters. (1/2)
jewishinsider.com/2026/01/clau...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.