First, Kristi Noem calls Los Angeles a "city of criminals"
Now she treats our own U.S. Senator @padilla.senate.gov, who is from Los Angeles, like he's a criminal.
This is how democracy unravels.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 32
Brad Sherman
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 32
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Brad Sherman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 32
SoupScore
Brad's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 117 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The assault of @padilla.senate.gov by Kristi Noem’s thugs is lawless and an outrage. It’s a sickening escalation of the violence this criminal administration is inflicting on Los Angeles, its residents, and now its democratically elected officials.
Saddened to hear of the horrific Air India crash in #Ahmedabad today, which may be the worst aviation disaster since 2014.
I want to express my sincerest condolences to the families of the victims and urge the authorities to conduct a full investigation.
#DonaldTrump keeps threatening to arrest @governor.ca.gov #Newsom
I've said it before, and said it again this morning on @cnn.com:
"If we're going to arrest any of the most prominent public officials, we should start with the one with 34 felony convictions."
I joined @cnn.com earlier today to discuss the latest on #DonaldTrump's response to the protests in #LosAngeles
Watch ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsOO...
I will be appearing on @cnn.com this morning at 9:20 AM EST/6:20 AM PT to discuss the latest developments on #DonaldTrump's unlawful and dangerous actions against Los Angeles.
Trump is shaping the narrative to make it seem as though riots are happening throughout LA. This is not the case. Only a small part of the City of LA has been subject to reports of violence.
I am proud to have drafted a statement signed by many of my Jewish colleagues about her outrageous antisemitic behavior. 3/3
Instead of demonstrating that the UN can address issues such as antisemitism from within and prevent continued efforts to undermine the UN’s credibility, Secretary General Guterres extended Ms. Albanese’s employment. 2/3
UN Special Rapporteur Albanese’s long history of antisemitism – she has regularly used antisemitic terms like the ‘Jewish lobby,’ taken money from pro-Hamas groups, and claims that Israel doesn’t have the right to defend itself or even to exist. 1/3
It's time for #DonaldTrump to fire #KristiNoem. Especially in light of the horrific January wildfires, the administration should be helping our city.
Instead, Noem calls L.A. a "city of criminals" — And refuses to apologize.
Today I stood in solidarity with my California Congressional colleagues in a press conference on the #Trump Administration's unlawful and dangerous actions against #LosAngeles
See highlights of my remarks ⬇️
Outrageous.
The #Trump administration should be spending that type of money to help Los Angeles recover from the January wildfires -- instead of working to start new fires.
www.politico.com/news/2025/06...
#KristiNoem say Los Angeles is a “city of criminals"
I love L.A. and apparently the #Trump administration hates L.A.
2/2
Read our statement below ⬇️
sherman.house.gov/media-center...
The Jewish community is reeling from terrorist attacks in DC & Boulder. I've drafted a statement which many Jewish Members joined demanding leadership take real action: pass the #Antisemitism Awareness Act & fund the Security Grant Program. Non-binding resolutions/platitudes no longer cut it. 1/2
Hey @nytimes.com fixed the headline for you.
I joined BBC News to discuss President #Trump's ICE raids in #LosAngeles
Watch ⬇️
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCxc...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.