PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Adrian Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Nebraska District 3
Born
December 19, 1970
Age 55
Phone
(202) 225-6435
Office
502 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Nebraska District 3

Adrian Smith

Adrian Michael Smith is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for Nebraska's 3rd congressional district since 2007. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 48th district in the Nebraska Legislature from 1999 to 2007. Smith is the dean of Nebraska's congressional delegation since 2022 following Jeff Fortenberry's resignation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 586
Yes76%
No22%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 3

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @RepAdrianSmithFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Adrian Smith headshot
Adrian Smith
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNebraska District 3
SoupScore
Adrian's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 86 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 12(source)
Doesn’t take a detective to uncover that Republicans are enacting Project 2025 – just last night they began dismantling the Dept. of Education. Everything points to them misusing the Comstock Act to ban abortion even in states where it’s legal. Today, I’m re-introducing a bill to stop them.
Text: This is what Heritage thinks a GOP president should do, as aid out in Project 2025: reviving the nineteenth-century Comstock Act as a federal (abortion) ban.
Reposted byTina Smith
Senator Bernie Sanders@sanders.senate.govMar 12(source)
Don’t tell me that Trump/Musk are not trying to destroy Social Security. 30,000 people died last year while waiting to get their benefits. Under this new policy, those numbers will skyrocket. We can’t kill seniors so that billionaires get their tax breaks.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 12(source)
Nothing to see here this is totally normal and happens all the time and isn’t weird at all and doesn’t signal any sort of corruption
Headline: Musk Seeks to Out $100 Million Directly Into Trump Political Operation
Headline: Trump selects a new Tesla on White House Driveway to show support for Elon Musk
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 12(source)
Taking health care from moms and babies just doesn’t produce quite enough money to shell out to corporations and billionaires, so he simply MUST dip his paws into grandma and grandpa’s Social Security too.   The rich can never be too rich right?
More Perfect Union
@moreperfectunion.bsky.social
Open post ↗
Elon Musk reiterated his intention to destroy programs like Social Security, which he has called a Ponzi scheme: "Most of the federal spending is entitlements... that’s the big one to eliminate."
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 11(source)
They’re doing their job because they love our public lands and want all of us to enjoy them. Not waste. Not fraud. But this is definitely abuse to our NPS workers.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 11(source)
Park Rangers often uproot their lives and move their families to some of the most remote areas in our country, and this is how we repay them? If you’ve ever met a Ranger (which I’m guessing Elon never has) you know they aren’t doing it because that’s where the money’s at.
Trump administration eyes 30 percent payroll reduction at National Park Service
The Trump administration is eyeing a 30 percent payroll reduction at the National Park Service, signaling big cuts at a high-profile government agency that could make headlines during the summer va…
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 10(source)
Your platform suffers a massive cyberattack but sure, definitely take the time to “own the libs” instead of getting your own house in order. Makes sense. Very *efficient* use of your time, Elon.
Yashar Ali 🐘
@yasharali.bsky.social
Open post ↗
“You are a traitor.” An absurd and insulting thing to say to anyone who posts what Senator Kelly did. And even more insulting since he served as a U.S. Navy captain and a NASA astronaut. Kelly was a combat pilot and flew 39 combat missions during Operation Desert Storm in the Gulf War.
Alt-Text: A screenshot of a post on X (formerly Twitter) by Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) and a reply from Elon Musk (@elonmusk). Senator Mark Kelly’s post reads: “Just left Ukraine. What I saw proved to me we can’t give up on the Ukrainian people. Everyone wants this war to end, but any agreement has to protect Ukraine’s security and can’t be a giveaway to Putin. Let me tell you about my trip and why it’s important we stand with Ukraine.” The post includes a photograph of a rusted, damaged tank covered in graffiti, parked in a public square. People are walking around the area, and a man wearing a camouflage cap and a brown jacket stands next to the tank. In the background, there is a yellow building with a blue roof and a sign that says “Mariupol.” Elon Musk’s reply to the post says: “You are a traitor.”
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 6(source)
Trump During SOTU: We are going to build the healthiest and most vital communities anywhere in the world. Trump Earlier That Day: Doctors only have to save a pregnant woman’s life in *some* states.
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 5(source)
YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE AIRLIFTED TO OTHER STATES TO OBTAIN HEALTH CARE THAT WILL SAVE YOUR LIFE!
Alice Miranda Ollstein
@alicemiranda.bsky.social
Open post ↗
BREAKING: Trump is dropping the EMTALA case it inherited from Biden — a battle with Idaho over patients' right to have an abortion in a medical emergency. An Idaho hospital warns women in crisis will once again be airlifted out of the state if courts don't act soon. www.politico.com/news/2025/03...
Tina Smith@smith.senate.govMar 5(source)
Musk is shamelessly enriching his minions with the salaries of hard-working Americans. He claims to be fighting government waste? Nope. Disgraceful but unsurprising.
Article posted by My Perfect Union Titled: Some DOGE employees are earning six-figure taxpayer-funded a salaries from the federal agencies they are shutting down.
← Newer postsPosts page 55Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
586 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYES—Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNOYES✕↔Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 105 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 106 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-04H.J. Res. 104 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 539 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-03H. Res. 672 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 747 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-09-02H.R. 4216 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 4275 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-23H.R. 3357 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-22H.R. 1917 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-22H.R. 3937 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-21H.R. 3351 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-21H.R. 3095 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentYESNO✕Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H.R. 4016 (119th)Approve amendmentNONO✓Failed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-18H. Res. 590 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-17H.R. 1919 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Failed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 12Next →