It was great to stop by the “Big Nansen” ski jump and check in on restoration efforts to the site.
The ski jump is an integral part of New Hampshire’s history, and I was proud to secure federal funding to help revive Big Nansen for current and future generations to enjoy.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes42%
No54%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align86%
Cross-party14%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jeanne Shaheen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Hampshire
SoupScore
Jeanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 97 sponsored · 327 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Even before Republican-led health care cuts, access to care was a challenge in our rural communities.
In Berlin, I had the opportunity to meet with regional health care leaders to discuss these cuts and the challenges facing rural health care in New Hampshire.
As I told Mishal Husain last week, several unanswered questions remain about the long-term plan in Venezuela.
But what is clear is this: every dollar spent in Venezuela costs Granite Staters, who are worried about rising grocery and energy bills.
No one should be able to control a woman’s decision on when or if to start a family - it's a fundamental right that must be protected.
As we mark the 53rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, know that I'll never stop fighting for every woman's access to reproductive care.
We must restore the ACA enhanced premium tax credits that expired on December 31st.
At a time when so many Americans are worried about the cost of living, Congress must fulfill its duty to protect Americans from rising health care costs.
Denmark and Greenland are happy to partner with us on anything the United States is interested in doing in Greenland.
That's the route we should be taking. It should be diplomatic.
The Supreme Court issued a disastrous ruling in Citizens United, and 16 years later, it has allowed our elections to become overrun with corporate money and big donors.
I remain committed to working to overturn this decision to restore power to the hands of the American people.
It was an honor to be recognized at last night’s National Cultural Diversity Council Martin Luther King, Jr. Dinner.
At a moment when hard-won civil rights protections are under pressure, I’m reminded of Dr. King's teachings and our collective duty to show up for our communities.
It's clear President Trump is more interested in threatening our nation's closest allies with steeper tariffs and straining historic partnerships than helping make life more affordable for American families and businesses. (5/5)
www.nbcnews.com/business/eco...
And tariffs aren't helping. The price of goods like coffee have spiked thanks to President Trump’s former 50% tariff tax on Brazil. (4/5)
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/b...
The cost increase is mainly in everyday essentials, like health care, where the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits are forcing families to make exceedingly difficult decisions. (3/5)
kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
Since Trump took office one year ago, Americans are spending an additional $1,625 on essential goods and services. For families across New Hampshire, the number is even higher: $2,100 on average. (2/5)
www.jec.senate.gov/public/index...
On the campaign trail, President Trump promised to lower the cost of everything. Yet, at every turn, he has chosen to make life more expensive for American families.
While President Trump calls affordability concerns a "hoax," the numbers tell a different story. 🧵(1/5)
Stories like Teresa’s, who saw her health care premiums spike 620%, have become all too common since the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits.
We must come to a bipartisan solution to ease the burden on families across the U.S.
www.ms.now/news/crushin...
Sen. Shaheen on @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social: "Donald Trump is playing right into the hands of Russia and China."
"Anything that splits the transatlantic alliance, anything that splits NATO, only benefits our adversaries."
As I made clear on @todayshow.com with Senator Murkowski, there is no need to pay for something when both Denmark and Greenland have said they're willing to partner with us on whatever the interests of the United States are.
This morning, I joined @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social from Denmark to emphasize the strong bipartisan support that exists for our U.S.-Denmark relationship and the continued importance of NATO participation.
With too many families struggling to afford everyday essentials like energy and health care, the President should be focused on lowering costs, not buying Greenland with $700 billion of taxpayer money.
For too long the U.S. has been dependent on China for critical minerals that power our economy and strengthen our security.
That’s why I'm introducing a bipartisan bill to create a new Strategic Resilience Reserve to bolster U.S. critical minerals supply.
With the ACA tax credits gone, many Americans are seeing the soaring cost of health insurance and are choosing to opt out entirely. That harms our health care system.
Democrats have been clear - Republicans in Congress and the White House must join us and act.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.