Tina Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
1958
Age 68
Phone
(202) 224-5641
Office
720 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Tina Smith

Christine Elizabeth Smith is an American politician, retired Democratic political consultant, and former businesswoman serving as the junior United States senator from Minnesota since 2018. She is a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), an affiliate of the Democratic Party.

Voting Record — 783
Yes24%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tina Smith headshot
Tina Smith
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Tina's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 284 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Rural hospitals are already squeezed – they can't afford to give out care without some form of payment from insurance companies. So, when our neighbors show up to the ER for care, and they don’t have Medicaid anymore, the hospital has to foot the bill.
I visit rural hospitals all the time. The Republican health care cuts won't just hurt them – they'll force them to close their doors. Patients will lose health insurance, skip getting care because they can't afford it, and then end up in the ER when it becomes too serious to ignore.
Reposted byTina Smith
HASSAN: What is habeas corpus? NOEM: Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country HASSAN: That's incorrect
Just like I thought. In the dead of night (on a Sunday no less) Republicans demanded to kick MORE people off their health insurance FASTER, because their previous proposal didn’t go far enough.
Can't wait to hear the political spin they're going to put on kicking 13 million people off their health insurance. To think this is their "moderate" proposal would be laughable if it wasn't so harmful.
Reposted byTina Smith
Republicans are scheduling votes in the DEAD OF NIGHT on Trump's "big, beautiful bill." They advanced their bill last night at 10:30PM. The next vote is scheduled for 1AM on Wednesday. Why hide? Maybe because this bill rips away health care from babies, new moms, and seniors.
Reposted byTina Smith
A whopping 76 percent oppose significant cuts to Medicaid. The tax bill that Republicans ultimately pass — public opinion be damned — will make life more difficult for millions of low-income Americans. Here’s everything you need to know ⤵️
There's a lot going on in the world at the moment... and how's the Senate spending its time? We're voting on Jared Kushner’s dad (a convicted felon who Trump pardoned) to be Ambassador to France, sending a billionaire convicted felon (and relative) to serve as a top diplomat.
To our friend Joe Biden — Archie and I wish you the best as you take care of yourself. Many families deal with cancer, and you have done so much to help them. Now we can support you and yours.
Republicans’ big beautiful bill sure is beautiful if you’re a millionaire. Not so much when you make 50k a year and you end up with LESS money in your pocket.
The New Hork Times
G.O.P. Tax Bill May Hurt the Lowest Earners and Help the Richest Even though most Americans may see lower taxes, Republicans' spending cuts could outweigh those benefits and leave some worse off.
I’m grateful to everyone who is putting themselves on the line to protect lives and land. In the face of loss and uncertainty, Minnesotans always show up for one another, and I know we’ll get through this together.
U.S. Senator Tina Smith standing next to Governor Tim Walz and U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar while addressing the press.
A road closure sign in front of a sheriff’s vehicle pulled over on the left side of the road and a maintenance truck on the right side of the road.
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar sitting next to U.S. Senator Tina Smith and Governor Tim Walz during the wildfire briefing.
Burnt trees and forest fire damage in front of a house that was kept safe.
It’s a rainy and smokey Duluth this morning as we come north to meet with emergency responders and survey the terrible damage from the northeastern Minnesota wildfires. Hope the rain helps.
Photo of Duluth, Minnesota with overcast and gray skies due to wildfire smoke.
These guys should have to look their constituents in the eye and say: You don’t deserve health care as much as Elon Musk deserves a tax break. Instead they’ll run and hide from their pissed off constituents like cowards while millions are kicked off of their health insurance.
@kv_swartz: After over 26 hours, stopping only for votes, Energy and Commerce advanced their markup along party lines. 

(35 mins short of the committee’s record)
This graph is devastating... too many of our kids are going hungry, and yet they're still plowing forward with the largest cuts to SNAP in American history. They're taking the $6/day that people get in food assistance so they can give it to the wealthiest corporations on the planet.
Graph depicting childhood food insecurity rate in 2023.
Clearly cutting Medicaid is unpopular, but they're still trying to do it. The reason? Because screwing over hard working people is okay with them if it means catering to their rich friends.
We can read - we’re not "claiming" millions will lose health insurance. It’s in the damn bill. Thanks for the free air time anyways, Fox News.
Screenshot of a Fox News segment where Cory Booker and Tina Smith and Brian Schatz decry Republicans' Medicaid cuts. The chyron reads "DEMS CLAIM GOP BILL WILL GUT MEDICARE, MEDICAID"
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationNOYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16