Greg Stanton headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Arizona District 4
Born
March 8, 1970
Age 56
Phone
(202) 225-9888
Office
207 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Arizona District 4

Greg Stanton

Gregory John Stanton is an American lawyer and politician who is the U.S. representative from Arizona's 4th congressional district, serving since 2019. A Democrat, he was previously mayor of Phoenix from 2012 to 2018, and was on the Phoenix City Council from 2000 until 2009.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 516
Yes46%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 4

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Greg Stanton headshot
Greg Stanton
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratArizona District 4
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 25 sponsored · 91 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Wesley already serves more uninsured patients than any other federally-funded community health center in AZ. I was proud to join local leaders and project partners to break ground for the new Mary Rose Wilcox Center which will help even more families access the care they need.
Extreme heat is a natural disaster that claims the lives of hundreds of Arizonans each year. That’s why I founded the Extreme Heat Caucus — and I was glad to join Co-Chair Rep. Mike Lawler at CSIS to discuss bipartisan solutions.
Democrats have put forward a petition to force a House vote on a three-year extension of the health care savings millions of Americans rely on. Many of my Republican colleagues have said they'd support a deal on health care once the government reopened. Now's their chance.
No veteran should be taken advantage of or charged for help accessing the benefits they rightfully earned. I'm proud to support the GUARD VA Act to crack down on "claims sharks" and ensure veterans have easy, accurate info on where to get assistance for free.
I want the government reopened, but not at the expense of families who are already stretched too thin. Any agreement to reopen the government should lower costs, protect health care, and support our communities back home. That’s the deal I’m fighting for.
Our veterans shouldn’t have to fight bureaucracy to get the care they were promised. I joined @wassermanschultz.house.gov’s amendment to restore cut VA funding so no veteran is left paying out of pocket for the care they deserve.
Trump’s tariffs are hidden taxes on Arizona families and small businesses. They drive up prices on food, construction materials, and household goods. I’m supporting @replindasanchez.bsky.social‘s amendment to roll back Trump’s tariffs to give people real relief from rising costs.
SNAP is also at risk thanks to Republicans’ so-called “One Big Beautiful Bill,” which will kick millions of kids, seniors, and veterans off the program. I’ve joined @houlahan.house.gov’s amendment to undo their long-term plans to gut SNAP and increase costs for working-class Americans.
When government shuts down, families pay the price — literally. Missed paychecks. Lost benefits. Higher costs. I joined @repjahanahayes.bsky.social’ amendment to ensure SNAP benefits keep flowing so families can afford groceries even when government funding runs out.
Health care is one of the biggest costs for working families. When premiums rise, everything else is harder to afford. That’s why I’m backing an amendment that would extend Affordable Care Act savings for three more years — keeping coverage affordable for millions of families.
The Senate’s funding bill may reopen the government — but at what cost to families? I’ve said all along: any deal has to lower costs & protect Americans’ health care. This one doesn’t. I’m fighting for a better deal that confronts our affordability & health care crises head-on.
The Lower Basin has done our part, offering a framework where cuts are automatic, predictable, and shared. The question now is whether the Upper Basin states will meet us halfway, or whether they'll continue pretending the river can deliver water it simply doesn't have.
Any proposal that doesn’t require every basin state to share in conservation is pure fantasy. Meanwhile, the president hasn’t even put forward a new nominee to lead the Bureau of Reclamation after yanking the last one over Upper Basin objections. We are running out of time.
The Lower Basin states — Arizona, California, and Nevada — have put forth a serious proposal committing to reduce consumption significantly through deep, permanent cuts. But our upstream neighbors continue clinging to century-old legal positions that ignore today's reality.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
516 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 11