Enough is enough.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|New Mexico District 1
Melanie A. Stansbury
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Melanie A. Stansbury
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratNew Mexico District 1
SoupScore
Melanie A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 22 sponsored · 164 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
For those who have been affected by the weather in Ruidoso!
Today, federal agents shot and killed a man in Minneapolis in plain sight. This is why we are fighting back against this lawless administration.
Millions are asking us to do something, while our colleagues stand in the way of basic accountability. We must stand for the people and their rights!
Minneapolis, we stand with you! ✊🇺🇸
📸 from @nytimes
I want to give a HUGE shoutout to all of the restaurants and chefs from NM who made the semifinals for the James Beard Awards!
To Bow & Arrow, Burque Bakehouse, Daydream Rum House, and chefs Steve Riley, Graham Dodds, and Danny Calleros—we are wishing you all the luck!
Make us proud!
Yesterday was the 53rd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, and we were with the leadership of @ppfa.org to talk about the fight ahead.
We stand shoulder to shoulder with the leaders and advocates who refuse to back down in the fight for reproductive justice. Because, healthcare is a human right. 💕
It’s been a crazy week. Funding bills. War powers. Trump v NATO. Gearing up on Environmental priorities. And, the #NMleg is back in the swing—leading the way! ⬇️
The buck stops here. Literally. Today, the House is voting on multiple funding bills and a War Powers Resolution I cosponsored with @repmcgovern.bsky.social. It’s time for Congress to reassert our authority and rein this Administration in!
Reposted byRep. Melanie Stansbury (NM-01)
For-profit prison companies are making record profits — HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS from taxpayer dollars — through the “Detention Industrial Complex” that ICE & the Trump administration has created.
Ok, but can we all agree this is super weird?
He can’t remember which country he threatened to invade and he says they “call him daddy”….?!?
On the anniversary of Citizens United, I have one thing to say: get big money out of politics!
Elections belong to the people, not billionaire donors, corporations, and dark money. The people.
This MUST be a top priority when we take back the House. It’s time to overturn Citizens United!
Is whatever is in the files that bad? Release. The. Epstein. Files.
Just to be clear, Republicans in the Oversight Committee just voted NO on a motion to hold Pam Bondi and the DOJ in contempt of Congress for violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
It’s time to defund ICE.
The DHS funding bill has dropped. I am a hard no on funding this out-of-control agency. The American people demand accountability.
We are one year into Trump’s second term, and it has been the most lawless, chaotic, and out-of-control presidency we’ve seen in our generation.
This President is unhinged. Our colleagues across the aisle who control both chambers MUST take action. Silence and inaction are not an option.
May we all have the audacity to believe…
-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964
Now more than ever, we must continue to show up, speak up, and do the work and to continue to bend that arc toward justice. It was a blessed and beautiful day to celebrate Dr. King and the work ahead.
Today, as we reflect on the life, legacy, & leadership of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., let us remember that the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. Not because it is inevitable—but because ordinary people choose courage over comfort, truth over silence, and love over hate.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.