Juan Vargas headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 52
Born
March 7, 1961
Age 65
Phone
(202) 225-8045
Office
2467 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 52

Juan Vargas

Juan Carlos Vargas is an American businessman and politician who has been a U.S. representative for California since 2013. His district includes the southernmost portions of San Diego County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 581
Yes40%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 52

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Juan Vargas headshot
Juan Vargas
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 52
SoupScore
Juan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 95 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans are saying "this has nothing to do with Epstein." It has everything to do with Epstein. Speaker Johnson must reopen the government, swear in Adelita Grijalva, and release the Epstein Files!
Speaker Johnson crashes Kelly and Gallego gaggle. Says he’ll swear in Grijalva when they reopen the government Kelly asking why Fine and Petronis got sworn in on pro forma, Johnson says it has to do with being on recess. Johnson: “this has nothing to do with Epstein”
A new nonpartisan report shows the cost of Republican plan to raise health care prices: – Premiums will more than double in 2026 – A 60 year old couple making $85k would have to pay $22,600 more a year This is what's at stake, and why we're fighting.
It’s been two years since Hamas' brutal October 7th attacks on Israel. Today, we remember and honor the innocent lives lost and the hostages who remain captive to this day. I continue to pray for peace and security for everyone affected in the region.
I am Latino. I speak Spanish. I go to Home Depot. Now that SCOTUS has greenlit indiscriminate immigration enforcement, what’s to stop ICE from picking me or anyone in our community who looks like me up? That’s why I’ve demanded answers from DHS about their use of unconstitutional racial profiling.
This is what's at stake. Time for my Republican colleagues to choose. Are you on the side of the people? Are you on the side of families trying to afford their care? Or will you continue to bow down to Trump, who's marching us closer to a shutdown? I'm going to keep fighting to save health care.
Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House. It's their basic responsibility to keep the government funded, and negotiate with Democrats if they need our votes. But they would rather shutdown the government than work with us to protect health care for millions.
New, and a big deal: Based on updated data and changes made by the Trump administration, we now estimate that ACA enrollees would see their out-of-pocket premiums increase by 114% if enhanced premium tax credits are allowed to expire. www.kff.org/affordable-c...
The Supreme Court greenlit racial profiling. ICE should not be able to stop and interrogate you just because of the way you look or the language you speak. It's an absolute outrage, and we're not going to stop sounding the alarm.
We are fighting to protect health care for families across the country. Republicans are trying to slash health care and they're willing to shutdown the government over it. Millions would lose coverage. Millions more would pay higher prices. That's what's at stake here.
Democrats think the American people deserve health care. Republicans would rather shut down the government than lower health care costs.
Graphic text: 
REPUBLICANS WANT TO SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT

WHY? THEY'D RATHER SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT THAN SAVE YOUR HEALTH CARE.

BUT WE'RE IN A HEALTH CARE CRISIS:
15 MILLION PEOPLE ARE GOING TO LOSE THEIR HEALTH CARE.
MILLIONS ARE ABOUT TO SEE THEIR PREMIUMS SKYROCKET.

DEMOCRATS THINK PEOPLE DESERVE HEALTH CARE.
An incredibly dangerous attack on the rule of law. Trump is trying to turn the Justice Department into a weapon for his own personal revenge, plain and simple. This is anti-democratic and anti-American, and we can't stay silent.
White House border czar Tom Homan reportedly accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents as a bribe in exchange for influencing government contracts. The Trump Admin ended the investigation. Corruption, plain and simple. We need answers!
Exclusive: Democrats in Washington are ramping up efforts to investigate White House border czar Tom Homan over allegations that he accepted $50,000 in cash from undercover FBI agents last year.
Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House. Keeping the government open is their most basic responsibility. If they want to go it alone, that's their choice. But if they need our votes, they need to work in a bipartisan way. This is not complicated.
Trump Always Chickens Out. Donald Trump just cancelled a high stakes meeting in the Oval Office with myself and Leader Schumer. The extremists want to shut down the government because they are unwilling to address the Republican healthcare crisis that is devastating America. Hold the line.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
581 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-09H. Res. 682 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3425 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-08H.R. 3424 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-04H.R. 4553 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 7 / 12Next →