This is so dangerous.
RFK disregards all science - opting instead for conspiracy theories.
It will cost American lives.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 781
Yes29%
No70%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align96%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Angela D. Alsobrooks
U.S. SenatorDemocratMaryland
SoupScore
Angela D.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 222 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
10 years ago, the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage.
As we celebrate this anniversary, we must keep fighting for our LGBTQ+ neighbors.
The arc of the moral universe is long, but I truly believe it will bend toward justice if we continue to do the work.
The CDC Director has the power to stand up for science and stand up to RFK trying to gut the CDC fluoride recommendations. Public health is at stake.
RFK directed the CDC to stop recommending fluoride in drinking water.
So I asked Trump’s pick for CDC director, who happens to be one of my constituents, if she believes her water in Potomac, MD is safe to drink?
She said yes.
That water is fluoridated.
The Republican bill is a scam to make working class people pay for billionaire tax breaks.
Join Senator Van Hollen and me tomorrow for a telephone town hall. ⬇️
A bunch of RFK's anti-vax conspiracy theorists "studying" childhood vaccines. What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
Barton O’Brien is a Marine Veteran who served three combat tours overseas.
He's a proud small business owner in Maryland who's rightly terrified that Trump's ridiculous tariffs will harm his business.
When you hurt small business owners, you hurt local economies.
They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Billionaires and massive corporations find Trump’s big bill beautiful.
But for 16M Americans who will lose health insurance?
The 129K Marylanders who could lose SNAP?
For them, it’s a hideous and inhumane bill. I'm voting NO.
16 MILLION Americans stand to lose health insurance because of Republicans’ Big, Bad Bill.
Why do Republicans insist on pulling the rug out from under hardworking Americans? It is irresponsible and callous.
3 years ago, this Trump-packed Supreme Court overturned 50 years of abortion rights.
Now my daughter and her generation have to fight for the same rights their grandmothers fought for.
Every woman is owed the freedom to make her own health care decisions. We will keep fighting.
It was an honor to join the ladies of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. and congratulate them on chartering two new chapters. It’s wonderful to see this organization of passionate women continue to grow. Their advocacy on behalf of all our communities is needed now more than ever.
No public official, including Members of Congress, the President, or the Vice President should be able to game the system with crypto schemes.
That's why I'm proud to work alongside Senator Schiff on this effort. New markets should remain FAIR.
My statement on President Trump's decision to bomb Iran:
Richard Schlueter's experimental cell therapy to treat his cancer was supposed to take 3-4 weeks. But now, because of cuts to NIH, it will take 8-10 weeks.
How can RFK justify abandoning cancer patients? RFK must resign. www.washingtonpost.com/science/2025...
Cruelty is at the center of this Administration's work.
This move will cost children's lives.
And still, not a thing has been done to lower costs or help hardworking Americans.
For a nation that reveres liberty, Juneteenth is an embrace of one of our bedrock principles.
We all thought the House Republican bill was bad.
But now Senate Republicans want to slash Medicaid even MORE??
Why do Republicans insist on kicking Americans off their health insurance to pay for tax cuts for billionaires?
It is callous and cruel.
Real scientists have lost faith in RFK.
The American people have lost faith in RFK.
I won't stop fighting until I see the headline that RFK has resigned. That's the greatest thing he could do on behalf of our nation's health.
NEW: ‘I no longer have confidence’: A senior physician and medical epidemiologist at @CDCgov who oversaw respiratory virus surveillance has resigned and raised concerns about the future of vaccine policy. My latest.
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...
APPLY TODAY‼️
Fall 2025 internship applications for my offices in DC, Baltimore, and Prince George’s County are open. Be sure to apply before the June 20 deadline.
Learn more and apply here⬇️ www.alsobrooks.senate.gov/services/int...
My father is the smartest man I know. I am where I am today thanks to his guidance.
Happy Father’s Day to my dad and to all the dads and father figures in Maryland.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History781 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
781 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16