This is not the first time Trump has put personal whims over public interest, but the consequences of dismantling NOAA would be catastrophic. Americans deserve a government that defends them against hurricanes and climate disasters, not one that sides with tech moguls over the truth.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 1
Suzanne Bonamici
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 569
Yes40%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Suzanne Bonamici
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 1
SoupScore
Suzanne's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 58 sponsored · 271 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Silencing NOAA scientists to appease billionaires and internet memes is not governance—it’s corruption.
The brazen attack on NOAA outlined in Project 2025 isn’t just dangerous—it’s economically devastating. Coastal economies generate trillions in revenue, and undermining NOAA’s research and conservation efforts would threaten industries from tourism to shipping to fisheries.
Without NOAA’s forecasts, people who fish for a living can’t safely navigate changing ocean conditions, farmers lose vital seasonal outlooks, wildfire responders can’t safely suppress fires, and millions of Americans will be left vulnerable to extreme weather.
Disrupting NOAA’s essential services will put lives and livelihoods at risk.
The Trump Administration, in a nefarious alliance with Elon Musk and DOGE, has its eyes on gutting NOAA—the very agency that tracks hurricanes, protects fisheries, and provides the basic weather data that businesses, farmers, first responders, and everyday people rely on.
This is an outrageous and reckless assault on science, the economy, and the safety of coastal communities across the country. 🧵
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
I had a productive discussion with higher education leaders from across the state about their concerns and how Oregon can stand against attempts to undermine public education and higher education.
Oregon’s colleges and universities open the doors of opportunity for hundreds of thousands of students, but their work has already become more difficult under the Trump administration.
This month and every month we recognize the vast contributions Black Americans have made to our country. Black history is American history, and it is perfectly appropriate that it be taught in our public school classrooms.
This is an egregious abuse of power that puts our personal and national security at risk. This can and will be challenged in court.
An unelected billionaire and his Musketeers should never be able to commandeer a federal agency or take control of a database that holds the personal information of millions of Americans.
Donald Trump is threatening to take away necessary funding from Oregon health centers because they provide comprehensive care for all of their patients.
It’s heartless and dangerous for Trump to prevent Oregonians from accessing the medical treatment they need.
I condemn this flagrant disregard of the Rule of Law and everyone who supports law and order, Republicans and Democrats, should be shouting from the rooftops.
www.kgw.com/article/news...
First Donald Trump pardoned more than 1500 convicted felons, many of whom assaulted police officers. Now he’s firing the federal prosecutors who held them accountable?
Trump’s new tariffs will increase the price of a wide range of goods, including many grocery items, and likely reverse the record job creation we saw during the Biden-Harris administration. The Oregonians I hear from want costs to go down, not up.
I appreciated the opportunity to join local leaders, faculty, and community members at PCC OMIC Future Makers’ Mixer. OMIC has helped establish Columbia County as a hub for advanced manufacturing and workforce development and its potential is unlimited.
I look forward to visiting the completed Elmonica Station and will continue to work with partners at the local and state level to address the affordable housing crisis.
Elmonica Station is a great example of how local governments and developers can work together to build housing that addresses the needs of the community, particularly for low-income families and workers who are most burdened by the persistent housing shortage.
Want school choice? Advocate for more magnet schools and programs in public schools, which are available to all and do not discriminate.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History569 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
569 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-09 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.