I'm standing with my Co-Chairs of the Democratic Veterans Caucus, @pkryan.bsky.social & @reptedlieu.bsky.social, in the fight to stop this Administration's attacks on our fellow veterans and their hard-earned benefits. [2/2]
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 17
Christopher R. Deluzio
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 17
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Christopher R. Deluzio
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 17
SoupScore
Christopher R.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 176 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Every veteran who served wrote this country a blank check. In return, we make a sacred promise that our government will deliver the care and benefits they’ve earned when they come home.
I am a proud Navy & Iraq War veteran, and you better believe I take that promise seriously. [1/2]
See here: bsky.app/profile/delu...
- Team Deluzio
If President Trump and his team want to shirk paying the cost of war and gut the VA, they better get ready to deal with some angry veterans who don't take kindly to a draft dodger screwing them over. [2/3]
Trump's Dept. of Veterans Affairs just union-busted VA workers—many of whom are veterans themselves—all so they can keep slashing the VA and privatizing care. [1/3]
✈ Washington Republicans just handed the ultra rich a fiscally reckless tax giveaway for private jets that'll cost us all $38 billion a year. But they refused to put back in tax savings for union dues and other workers’ costs.
The D.C. GOP is waging class warfare against hardworking Americans.
I talk a lot about Economic Patriotism. Here's what that means to me. It comes down to the Common Good, with love of country at the heart of it.
I'm all for making our government more efficient. DOGE paying government employees NOT to do their work for the American people? That’s wasting tens of billions of public money.
My fellow veterans and I already know that firing VA staff has a real impact on veterans' care, and we demand answers.
Did senior VA officials in Washington force Pittsburgh leadership to cancel these town halls?
Sorry to hear that. There should be an unsubscribe button, but please email RepDeluzio@mail.house.gov with your info and we can manually unsubscribe you.
- Team Deluzio
I’m demanding real answers from the ICE Acting Director so I can conduct the constitutional oversight I was elected to do.
Read my full letter here [2/2]
I'm tired of ICE ducking my questions.
We’ve seen the reports out of Ambridge about ICE's immigration enforcement, so I had my team ask ICE basic oversight questions—the response we got back was pathetic nonsense. [1/2]
What are Donald Trump and Washington Republicans hiding in the Epstein Files?
Costs are still rising & ripping people off in Western PA. Take a look at an electric bill lately?
Yet Washington Republicans are making it worse, passing a budget law that is going to raise your utility bills even more.
Their reckless cuts will jack up the cost of utilities, healthcare, and more.
Take a watch and learn about who’s getting rich off your ripoff utility bills.
Release the files.
The starvation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza has got to stop, and aid must be surged in now.
📈Unemployment is up, costs are up, and people are hurting.
This is what happens when weak politicians let rich and powerful people and corporations rig our system.
Washington Republicans are failing, period.
🚨Trump’s Treasury Secretary just said it: they are trying to privatize Social Security🚨
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.R. 4553 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 105 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 106 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-04 | H.J. Res. 104 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 539 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-03 | H. Res. 672 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 747 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-09-02 | H.R. 4216 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.