Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Cindy Hyde-Smith is an American politician and lobbyist serving since 2018 as the junior United States senator from Mississippi. A member of the Republican Party, she served from 2012 to 2018 as the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce and from 2000 to 2012 in the Mississippi State Senate.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Installing a crank economist to only publish favorable or distorted data on the economy (inflation, jobs numbers, etc.)   Textbook authoritarianism – mum from my GOP colleagues.
🚨 Trump's new BLS nominee E.J. Antoni suggests pausing the monthly jobs report: Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data
Many VA employees are veterans themselves. Canceling their union contracts is not only insulting to their service, but it’s going to make the quality of care for our veterans worse. These men and women made incredible sacrifices for our country. This is not how we repay them.
The VA terminating the union contracts of their workers is an ambush on the people who care for our veterans. The Trump admin may think they can silence anyone who pushes back against their unlawful and anti-worker actions, but we aren’t going anywhere. aflcio.org/press/releas...
Reminder that insurrectionists attacked police officers on January 6th and Trump pardoned every one of them.   This one wanted to go after the officer he attacked.
A Jan. 6 defendant, convicted for the brutal beating of an MPD officer, lost his bid to FOIA records about the victim officer — in part because Trump's pardon made it moot Webster, a former NYPD officer, had been sentenced to 10 years before the pardon ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...
Reposted byTina Smith
Under 5 U.S.C §2954, HSGAC has the unique authority to request information from any executive agency that falls within our Committee’s oversight jurisdiction. We are using that authority to request the Epstein files from AG Bondi. The American people deserve transparency.
I hear about this all the time from constituents. People are repulsed by the inhumanity of this and how innocent people are being targeted when they are just trying to figure out how to get just a little bit of food – literally starving to death. I stand firmly against that.
Civilians in Gaza have been turned into a weapon of war in a way that is despicable. The point of this letter and the point of what many of us have been doing for months is to put pressure on the Netanyahu government to change their policy.
The humanitarian situation in Gaza is untenable. Netanyahu needs to take responsibility to solve this problem instead of continually pushing the blame off on others. The hostages need to be returned. We need an end to the fighting.
Children are starving. Civilian deaths continue to mount. Hostages are still held. Today I led 43 of my Senate colleagues in demanding the State Department work urgently to end the humanitarian disaster in Gaza. This cannot continue.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
851 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-05-14End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (54-40)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-05-13End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-05-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-05-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-05-12Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-12End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-08S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-08H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (50-43)
2025-05-08S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (50-38)
2025-05-07S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 60 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47)
2025-05-06Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-05-06S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-06H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (55-45)
2025-05-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43)
2025-05-01End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-05-01S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-46)
2025-05-01H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-45)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 49 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-04-30S.J. Res. 49 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Defeated (49-49)
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 75 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-30H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-46)
2025-04-29H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (83-14)
2025-04-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-13)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (60-36)
2025-04-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (62-36)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-04-29End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-39)
2025-04-29Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (67-29)
2025-04-28End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (64-27)
2025-04-11Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (60-25)
2025-04-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-25)
2025-04-11Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (59-26)
2025-04-11End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (59-25)
2025-04-10Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-46)
2025-04-10End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-10H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (53-44)
2025-04-09H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-04-09Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (60-37)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 18Next →