Reposted byTina Smith
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Sounds like they need to… release the Epstein files.
Food and water should never be politicized. Netanyahu's disregard for civilian life is appalling.
The near-total blockade of food and aid into Gaza must end – innocent children are being starved.
Nothing about this is “routine.”
The President of the United States was involved with a sex offender.
No way… you’re kidding! That’s crazy…
BREAKING WSJ:
The Justice Department told Trump in May that his name is in the Epstein files.
Many other high-profile figures were also named, Trump was told.
www.wsj.com/politics/jus...
Reposted byTina Smith
Fork found in kitchen. www.wsj.com/politics/jus...
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump's cruelty knows no bounds. This is a violation of basic human dignity.
Epstein files are real but also they’re not but they’re on Pam Bondi’s desk and we’re going to release them but we also can’t (even though we promised we would) and let's talk about someone else because this is really inconvenient for us and even our own supporters are furious
30 years of public service is no small feat - advocating for farmers, veterans, and working families in Buffalo and across the state. Senator Anderson will be remembered as a fighter for the state he loved.
May his memory be a blessing.
Reposted byTina Smith
I’m confused. Trump says the Epstein files are a hoax. But they’re on AG Bondi’s desk for review. Also, they don’t exist. And if they did exist, they were written by Barack Obama.
The “most transparent administration in history” is shutting down a branch of government early because that’s how badly they don’t want to release the Epstein files.
Reposted byTina Smith
Jim Parsons slams Donald Trump for removing LGBTQ+ specialising counselors from the 988 Suicide lifeline:
“It is only hurtful and it feels like it’s only being done in order to make a point — we’re getting rid of this because we want to make sure certain people understand they’re not welcome here.”
Amy’s right. Republicans are rewarding states for creating more waste and committing more fraud.
For all that talk from Congressional Republicans about eliminating waste, they ultimately rewarded it in their Big Beautiful Betrayal. More from me in @postopinions.bsky.social:
www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Has anyone checked Mar-A-Lago for the Epstein files? Heard he likes to keep sensitive documents there...
With a clean bill of health, I’m ready to get back to work fighting for Minnesotans.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.