Was able to work with a few Republicans to push back and tell RFK Jr. to re-hire these folks.
Cutting off heating assistance is stupid and reckless.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 787
Yes74%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 38 sponsored · 183 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Stock market in complete limbo, retirement savings disappearing, farmers facing devastating uncertainty… and he went golfing.
If he ran a company the way he ran the country this weekend, he’d be fired.
Talking about the chaos of Trump’s tariff tactics on @cnn.com
Reposted byTina Smith
I'm calling for an investigation into Trump's reckless tariff policy.
It’s incoherent. And it’s driving up costs for working families.
Republicans want to cut nutrition programs and veterans benefits to pay for tax cuts for their billionaire friends.
Today, this country is alive with people using their voices to say: keep your hands off our democracy.
No, I still won’t vote for him.
We had a blizzard along the North Shore this week, and Musk’s answer is to shut off heating assistance?
No. I want answers. I fought for this funding for a reason and I’m not just going to sit and watch it get ripped away from Minnesotans.
I needed to take a minute and point out the rampant hypocrisy I’m seeing right now.
Just heard DOGE/Musk are cutting half of the staff at the Social Security offices in Alexandria. 40% of the staff in Rochester.
It’ll make it a lot harder for seniors to get help when they run into issues, which might be exactly what they want.
Stock market’s crashing, retirement savings are disappearing… and he’s out golfing.
And history will repeat itself unless Republicans join us and stand up to these across the board tariffs.
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump’s tariff proposal is the largest tax increase in American history.
Reposted byTina Smith
Trump just imposed, by executive order, the single largest tax increase on consumers in American history.
“Liberation” Day.
Is that why politicians on your own team are begging for exemptions?
Sen. Strom Thurmond voted against the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, AND supported Jim Crow laws.
Thurmond’s record for longest floor speech (in protest of the Civil Rights Act, no less!) was just broken by a Black man, my good friend Cory Booker.
That’s America.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History787 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
787 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.