He put our troops at risk. Then lied about it. This was dangerous and completely unacceptable.
Pete Hegseth should be fired.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes72%
No26%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 193 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Seems like Pete Hegseth thinks Pete Hegseth should resign.
FEMA provides life-saving assistance for Americans after natural disasters. This would kill people.
Not on my watch.
Abortion bans kill women.
As much as I agree, he's not the only one that should be held accountable.
There were multiple sitting Cabinet Secretaries sharing classified war plans in a GROUP CHAT. They knew better.
Yesterday, Tribal Nations in Minnesota and the Mille Lacs Singers honored me by participating in a Flag Ceremony.
I will proudly display all 11 Tribal flags in my offices.
Circling back on this…
Reposted byTina Smith
Pete Hegseth’s morning routine just dropped.
Maybe Trump should worry less about how he looks in literally one portrait in Colorado and more about his Cabinet members texting classified war plans in Signal group chats…
THAT is what's not a good look here.
The sustained effort by DeJoy, Musk and Trump to dismantle the post office is an attempt to cut off a lifeline to people across Minnesota and America.
I’m on the side of the postal workers.
Musk and Trump need to stay the hell away from USPS.
Postal workers provide an essential constitutional service, ensuring that folks have their medicine, bills and paychecks on time.
Honored to help kick off an exciting day at the Armed Forces Hockey Tournament in the State of Hockey!
Public transit is about connecting people to their work, school, health care and more – it’s about economic opportunity.
I was so excited to celebrate the Gold Line’s first day of service, thanks to the partnership of local, state and federal officials.
Filled with gratitude after St. Louis Park’s first annual Iftar. Sending all who celebrate my good wishes and prayers for a blessed iftar with your loved ones!
The rights these protesters fought for 60 years ago are still under threat today.
We can’t forget. We can never be afraid of getting in good trouble.
Trump and Republicans are making your life more expensive. I voted against his funding bill because it doesn’t come close to meeting the needs of Minnesotans. Many of the projects it cut have to happen regardless, and without federal support, you’ll be the one paying for it.
Hands off our health care.
Needs 60 Senate votes to completely dismantle it and you can count me as a hell no.
See you in court.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.