Sara Jacobs headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 51
Born
February 1, 1989
Age 37
Phone
(202) 225-2040
Office
2348 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 51

Sara Jacobs

Sara Josephine Jacobs is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative for California's 51st congressional district since 2023, previously representing the 53rd congressional district from 2021 to 2023. Her district includes central and eastern portions of San Diego, as well as eastern suburbs such as El Cajon, La Mesa, Spring Valley, and Lemon Grove. A member of the Democratic Party, she is the youngest member of California's congressional delegation. She is the Caucus Leadership Representative, making her the youngest member of the Democratic House leadership.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 567
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 51

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Sara Jacobs headshot
Sara Jacobs
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 51
SoupScore
Sara's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 139 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Trump just ramped up tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%. This will raise manufacturing costs and hit San Diego’s craft beer industry hard. Small business owners across our district have told me the same thing: these broad, untargeted tariffs are hurting them.
I know many of you have serious concerns about active duty Marines being deployed to our cities - I do too. Today, I voiced my concerns and asked the Commandant of the Marine Corps questions about their required training to ensure these Marines follow the law.
My generation was the first to grow up with school shooter drills – but we’re not the last. We will keep fighting alongside groups like Shaphat Outreach to pass common-sense laws that save lives so that we never have to recognize another Wear Orange Day again.
I was heartbroken to see Ascension Lutheran Church’s Pride banner recently vandalized for the third time. As we celebrate National Pride Month, everyone deserves to feel safe and respected. San Diego must stand united against all forms of hate and violence 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
3 people stand in a parking lot. Rep. Jacobs stands on left. Pastor Rick stands on right, pointing off camera.
Vandalized PRIDE banner reading "Welcome, Inclusion, Celebration" lays crumpled in a parking lot.
Would you look at that: the Department of Government Efficiency has not actually been efficient at all. By some counts, it’s cost taxpayers more money than it’s saved and has certainly caused chaos that literally led to people dying.
This isn’t meant to ensure public safety; it's meant to scare and intimidate people. And if Trump can do this in California, he can ignore the wishes of *any* governor in *any* state. That’s why we all need to stand up against this unprecedented abuse of power.
Marines are trained for combat – not crowd control, de-escalation, or community policing. So this increases the potential for escalation, poor judgment, and excessive force against Americans who are exercising their constitutional First Amendment rights.
First off, military personnel – including the National Guard and Marines – should not (and under current legal authorities cannot) be used for civilian law enforcement. This represents a serious erosion of the civil-military divide and sets a dangerous precedent.
These immigration raids don’t define us, but our response to them does. I was proud to have dinner at Buona Forchetta to show my support as they deal with the fallout of the raid where agents threw out flash bangs in order to arrest restaurant workers — not hardened criminals.
Deploying the National Guard to LA is an unnecessary escalation. No one wants their community to become militarized — it raises the potential for people to get hurt and erodes public trust. President Trump, don’t do this.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
567 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 164 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 28 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-14H.R. 153 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-14H.R. 152 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-13H.R. 192 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-09H.R. 23 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-07H.R. 29 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)Motion to Commit with InstructionsYESYESFailed
2025-01-03H. Res. 5 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-03Election of the SpeakerNOT_VOTINGJohnson (LA)
2025-01-03Call by StatesPRESENTPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 12