The GOP’s Farm Bill locked in the $187B in cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to make way for $5 trillion tax goodie giveaway in the One Big Bloated Borrowing Bill.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 16
Sam T. Liccardo
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes42%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 16
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sam T. Liccardo
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 16
SoupScore
Sam T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 15 sponsored · 37 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
United Way Bay Area connects families in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties with resources to stay healthy, support their kids, and build financial stability.
Congress did not entrust the public airwaves to the FCC so that it could auction off America to Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha. This will not stand. Brendan Carr & the FCC must deny Paramount’s attempt to sell our media to foreign authoritarian regimes.
www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/bus...
Today, we remember the 51st anniversary of Black April.
Pete Hegseth’s Signal chat may have gone quiet, but thankfully @magaziner.house.gov keeps me entertained.
Republicans are trying to pass a budget with trillions of dollars of imaginary savings.
The Court refuses to reckon with extensive evidence of Louisiana’s history of voter suppression of Black Americans.
csdp.princeton.edu/publications...
The majority’s opinion permits gerrymandered maps drawn along partisan lines, but prohibits maps drawn to rectify longstanding discrimination.
This flawed outcome exacerbates America’s racial divide, and underscores Congress’s responsibility to pass a national anti-gerrymandering law. 🧵
www.axios.com/2026/04/29/s...
Vui lòng đăng ký nhận bản tin của chúng tôi để biết thông tin về các buổi gặp gỡ tiếp theo: liccardo.house.gov/contact/news...
Chúng tôi đã tổ chức các buổi gặp gỡ trao đổi trực tiếp với các thành viên của cộng đồng người Mỹ gốc Việt vào thứ Bảy tại nhà hàng Rong Biển ở Little Saigon. Tôi rất trân trọng những cuộc trò chuyện và cơ hội được lắng nghe trực tiếp các ưu tiên của quý vị.
Please sign up for our newsletter to find out about our next office hours: liccardo.house.gov/contact/news...
We hosted office hours with members of our Vietnamese-American community Saturday at Rong Bien restaurant in Little Saigon. I appreciated the opportunity to hear one-on-one the concerns, views, and questions of the community members who joined us.
Our team stands ready to help. If you need assistance with disability cases with SSDI or the VA, please call our San Jose office at (408) 245-2339
Grateful to the San Andreas Regional Center for bringing us together to support our neighbors and loved ones with special needs, and to celebrate their unique contributions.
ICYMI: We introduced a bill protecting whales in the Bay from vessel strikes. Proud of Andrew for leading this effort and introducing his first bill. He's already making a splash, so we’re spouting off about it…please refrain from groaning about “dad jokes” in your comments. 🐳
With new technology, like artificial intelligence, there's more we can do to collect large data sets that can help folks anticipate the pathways of these migrating whales.
Political violence has no place in our democracy.
Thank you to the Secret Service for acting quickly and keeping everyone safe.
Today, on Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, we remember the 1.5 million people who lost their lives. Together we stand with our district’s Armenian American community 111 years later as we honor their memory.
We're literally seeing grandma's retirement seized to build sports stadiums.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.