Four Republicans didn’t join Democrats to protect me, they joined to defend the first amendment and sanity. No one should be going after them. This country stands for freedom and right now what people are doing is totally unacceptable.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Minnesota District 5
Ilhan Omar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 496
Yes39%
No58%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align96%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 5
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Ilhan Omar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMinnesota District 5
SoupScore
Ilhan's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 149 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Thank you to my colleagues for having my back and not furthering lies on the House floor.
Appreciate them safeguarding first amendment protections and the usage of the censure.
Finally some sanity in the House.
This is all an attempt to push a false story so she can fundraise and boost her run for Governor.
Fun fact: Nancy Mace is trying to censure me over comments I never said.
Her res does not contain a single quote from me because she couldn’t find any.
Unlike her, I have routinely condemned political violence, no matter the political ideology.
To those claiming they're for free speech while punishing and silencing those for exercising that right: You're not pro-free speech. 🤔
Data isn’t vibes. If you need vibes, check out the hate filled comments the rightwing will leave on this post and all my posts.
Today, we remember the thousands of lives lost and the heroic first responders in the largest terror attack on U.S. soil.
I will continue to fight to make sure we take care of our first responders and families who lost loved ones.
Now and forever we must #NeverForget.
Political violence is absolutely unacceptable and indefensible. Unconscionable acts of violence should have no place in our country. Let’s pray for no more lives being lost to gun violence.ll
The pedophile protection party at it again.
This is the third school year kids in Minnesota will receive FREE meals at school.
Power of organizing! 💪🏽
The Israeli government is holding Mohammed Zaher Ibrahim, a 16-year-old Palestinian-American citizen, in prison. He has been held without trial for over six months.
He must be released.
My favorite stops at the fair 🎡
Nothing better than a day at the fair 🥰
Reposted byIlhan Omar
Tackling gun violence shouldn’t be a Democrat or Republican issue. We should work together as Americans to stop another act of terror from happening again.
That starts with a ban on assault weapons.
Our children deserve to grow up without the fear and trauma of gun violence.
It is inexcusable to overturn the DFL endorsement from Omar Fateh.
A small group, a majority living outside Minneapolis, met privately to overturn the will of Minneapolis delegates who volunteered, organized, and participated in a months-long DFL process.
Unacceptable www.axios.com/local/twin-c...
Reminder: Donald Trump has voted by mail in multiple elections.
The vote-by-mail fraud rate is 0.00006%.
This isn’t about election integrity, it is a way to disenfranchise millions of voters.
Outrageous. Over 200 journalists have been murdered by the Israeli military.
Grateful for the courageous truth-teller journalists in Gaza for their bravery and sacrifice to tell the stories of Gaza to the world.
Shame on the continuation of funding this genocide.
JD Vance and other pedophile protection party officials are holding an emergency meeting tonight over their strategy on the Epstein files.
This cover-up is a disgrace to Epstein’s victims. The American people deserve transparency and accountability.
Release the Epstein files.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History496 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
496 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 36 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-05-05 | H.R. 530 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 78 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 859 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1442 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H.R. 1402 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-29 | H. Res. 354 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | S. 146 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-28 | H.R. 973 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 22 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-04-10 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1228 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-10 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-04-09 | H.R. 1526 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.