The cost of living is still too high for hardworking Nevadans – and Trump’s reckless tariffs are only making things harder for them.
I’ve voted twice to block this tax on families, and I’ll keep fighting back in any way possible to give families more breathing room.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Jacky Rosen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes38%
No61%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align90%
Cross-party10%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Jacky Rosen
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Jacky's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 70 sponsored · 229 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Without your health, you have nothing. And the “Big Beautiful Bill” is a big ugly assault on Nevadans’ health. (2/2)
Republican cuts to Medicaid mean tens of thousands of Nevadans lose their health care access, hospitals are at risk of shutting down, and premium costs could nearly double for those with private insurance. (1/2)
Senate Republicans blocked @gallego.senate.gov’s resolution calling for the release of the Epstein files, and now Republicans in the House are leaving town so they don’t have to vote on it.
What are Republicans in Congress so scared of? Donald Trump should release these files like he promised.
As Trump’s reckless tariffs cause increasing economic uncertainty, it’s more important than ever that we make sure big corporations aren’t using the chaos as cover to unfairly jack up prices for American consumers even higher.
I’m joining my colleagues in urging the FTC to investigate.
Trump’s illegal, cost-raising tariffs amount to a national sales tax.
We need to lower costs, not raise them, which is why I joined my colleagues in urging a federal appeals court to uphold a decision ending Trump’s chaotic tariffs.
Donald Trump's proposed cuts to housing programs are cruel and dangerous at a time when Nevada is facing a housing crisis.
We need to help hardworking families afford a home, which is why I’m calling on Senate Republicans to reject these cuts and protect the resources our communities rely on.
Emergency housing vouchers have helped Nevadans get a place to call home.
But Trump’s Dept. of Housing has canceled this voucher program four years early at a time when we’re experiencing a housing crisis. It’s cruel and I’ll push back.
nevadacurrent.com/2025/07/15/b...
Nevada families will see their household electricity bills go up because of Congressional Republicans’ Big, Beautiful Betrayal of a law.
Higher prices for you, lower taxes for billionaires: that’s what Congressional Republicans did.
This is what we kept warning about: 100,000+ Nevadans will lose their Medicaid because of Trump and Congressional Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal.
On top of that, hospitals will miss out on critical funding – affecting everyone’s access to care, even if you have private insurance.
Nevada’s law enforcement officers do incredible work to keep our communities safe.
I’ll always work across party lines to make sure our police officers have the resources and support they need to do their jobs.
Being able to work hard and afford a nice place to live is a cornerstone of the American Dream.
But right now, it’s out of reach for too many.
Congress needs to help level the playing field for hardworking families, including by cracking down on those jacking up housing prices.
Americans will die because Trump and Congressional Republicans have made cruel cuts to Medicaid.
This was done just to give billionaires more tax breaks.
Shameful.
www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...
It’s incomprehensible that the Admin is withholding critical federal funding to fight the fentanyl crisis in Nevada and all across the nation.
The fentanyl crisis is destroying communities, and we can’t play politics with overdose prevention. The Trump Admin must release this funding ASAP.
I’ll keep working to do everything in my power to lower grocery prices by cracking down on price gouging and putting an end to Trump’s reckless tariffs. (2/2)
Nevada families work hard, play by the rules, and deserve to have a chance to get ahead. But they’re still seeing high costs at the grocery store that are squeezing their budgets. (1/2)
The American people were promised transparency about the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Trump is now calling this case a “hoax,” and Senate Republicans just blocked a resolution to show what’s in the files.
What does Trump have to hide?
Trump promised he would bring prices down on “Day One.”
Instead, his reckless tariffs are making hardworking families pay more for essentials like groceries and gas.
He has basically imposed a new tax on families.
edition.cnn.com/2025/07/15/e...
Last year, more than 500 Nevadans died from heat-related illnesses in Clark County alone.
I’m introducing a bill to classify extreme heat as a major disaster, allowing our communities to access the federal funding they need to keep people safe.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-40) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-05-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-05-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-08 | S. 1582 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-49, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.