Ukraine’s future must be in NATO — the most successful defensive alliance in history. Ruling out Ukraine’s NATO membership before peace talks even begin will only embolden Putin’s aggression.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
Michael F. Bennet
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes29%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Michael F. Bennet
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
Michael F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 64 sponsored · 223 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The Trump Administration’s efforts to allow ICE to take enforcement action in protected areas are deeply concerning and go against long-standing precedent.
Every Coloradan should feel safe to go to school, church, and the doctor without fear of arrest.
I’ve said repeatedly that Tulsi Gabbard is a dangerous and completely unqualified choice to lead our intelligence community.
I'm headed to the Senate floor soon to oppose her confirmation to DNI.
We must continue demanding more from our country’s highest leaders.
I was glad to help secure funding for a new Eagle County treatment center that will provide critical mental health services to CO’s central mountain communities. Mental and behavioral health is health, and it’s time we treat it that way.
From A-Basin to Wolf Creek, Colorado’s National Forests are home to some of the best skiing in the world.
Senator John Barrasso and I reintroduced our bipartisan SHRED Act to keep ski fees local, bolster Colorado’s outdoor recreation economy, and help our mountain communities thrive.
This tax season, hundreds of thousands of Colorado families will be eligible for a new Family Affordability Tax credit.
I’m grateful Coloradans across our state will benefit from this important lifeline.
Learn more⬇️
President Trump repudiated his dangerous proposal to deploy U.S. troops to “take over” the Gaza Strip after his plan received worldwide backlash and criticism.
He must also abandon his plan for the U.S. to seize Gaza and eject its two million people to build the “Riviera of the Middle East.”
DOGE’s access to classified data - including the sensitive personal information of Americans - is unprecedented and deeply concerning.
I joined my Senate Intel Committee colleagues to demand answers on this major threat to American privacy and national security.
Whether they voted for President Trump or not, the American people emphatically do not support sending U.S. soldiers to "take over" the Gaza Strip so that he can build a "Riviera of the Middle East."
This is a reckless and dangerous proposal.
The dedicated cybersecurity and tech experts at the CIA will have no trouble finding high-paying work in the private sector. We should do everything we can to keep these talented public servants in our federal workforce instead of driving them away.
USAID saves lives and is critical to U.S. national security. Alongside @kaine.senate.gov and my colleagues, I'm pushing for immediate answers about President Trump’s efforts to eliminate this critical agency.
Tulsi Gabbard has repeatedly refused to answer questions that matter to the American people and affect her ability to lead.
As the U.S. faces serious security threats at home and abroad, she is a dangerous choice for DNI. I voted NO on her confirmation today.
Our Colorado and D.C. offices are currently experiencing increased call volume.
If you are unable to get through, please try back, leave a voicemail, or send us an email at www.bennet.senate.gov/contact/writ...
Thank you for your patience. We value your opinion!
RFK Jr. is a dangerous and completely unqualified choice to be our nation’s highest health official.
That’s why I voted against his nomination today – I urge all of my Senate colleagues to do the same.
Every February, we recognize the countless contributions of Black Americans throughout our state and country’s history - including efforts to make America more free, democratic, and just.
Learn more about Black history in Colorado⬇️
Reports of meddling in important Treasury payment systems is incredibly dangerous and risks severe damage to our country and economy. I will be pushing for answers alongside my colleagues on the Senate Finance Committee.
Two days since Trump announced tariffs on our top trading partners:
✅Stock market plummeted
✅Trade war started
✅Grocery prices rising
Tax filing season is officially here - some important resources for Coloradans⬇️
✅Learn about free file options: irs.gov/file-your-taxes-for-free
✅Find assistance near you: getaheadcolorado.org/gethelp
✅Learn if you are eligible for tax credits: getaheadcolorado.org/calculator
How is raising grocery and gas prices putting America First?
🎉 Great news: DELTA High School’s Janet Damon is a finalist for National Teacher of the Year.
I’m glad this incredible Colorado educator is getting the recognition she deserves for her dedication to our students.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History789 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
789 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-08 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-43) |
| 2025-05-08 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (50-38) |
| 2025-05-07 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 60 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-05-06 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-05-06 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (55-45) |
| 2025-05-05 | H.J. Res. 61 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-05-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-05-01 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-05-01 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-40) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (49-49, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-04-30 | S.J. Res. 49 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (49-49) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 75 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-30 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | H.J. Res. 42 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (83-14) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-13) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (60-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-36) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-39) |
| 2025-04-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-29) |
| 2025-04-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-27) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-25) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (59-26) |
| 2025-04-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-25) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-10 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | H.J. Res. 20 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-42) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-37) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-04-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-42) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (66-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-32) |
| 2025-04-08 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-04-07 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-39) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-05 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.