Emanuel Cleaver headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Missouri District 5
Born
October 26, 1944
Age 81
Phone
(202) 225-4535
Office
2217 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Missouri District 5

Emanuel Cleaver

Emanuel Cleaver II is an American politician and United Methodist pastor serving as the U.S. representative for Missouri's 5th congressional district since 2005. A member of the Democratic Party, he previously served as the 51st mayor of Kansas City, Missouri, from 1991 to 1999, becoming the first Black person to hold that role.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 498
Yes39%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting5%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 5

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Emanuel Cleaver headshot
Emanuel Cleaver
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMissouri District 5
SoupScore
Emanuel's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 19 sponsored · 187 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

House Republicans are using President Trump’s war with Iran to attempt to force Congress to fund ICE and CBP without substantial reforms despite their policies of harassing, detaining, beating, and killing American citizens.
Thousands of Americans stranded abroad, and the President admits there was no evacuation plan.  No imminent threat. No strategy. Just reckless decision-making, costing American lives and billions of taxpayer dollars.
I joined colleagues in calling on the State Department to use all available resources – including charter flights & coordination with allies – to help stranded Americans return home safely and quickly.
Terminating union contracts and gutting enforcement doesn’t make taxes more fair, it lets billionaires off the hook and punishes the people who help everyday Americans file and pay what they owe.
100 days to go until the FIFA World Cup comes to the U.S. With matches, fan events, and visitors from around the world, this tournament will be a major moment for Kansas City and a chance to showcase our heartland hospitality on a global stage.
Instead of ensuring American safety and strong diplomatic footing, we see the consequences of starving our foreign service at the very moment it’s needed most. The American people shouldn’t pay the price for ideological budget slashing.
Cuts driven by DOGE’s overhaul have hollowed out the State Department’s capacity abroad, crippling our ability to help citizens in crisis.
Maj. Gen. Randy Manner (Ret.): "It's a little bit disheartening to hear that the UK govt is arranging transport for the British citizens, whereas here as Americans we feel abandoned. The State Dept is in survival mode because as we know the administration reduced their budget by almost half."
So when Secretary Noem doubles down on unfounded attacks instead of accountability – from ad contracts to the deaths of American citizens under DHS operations – it’s not just shameful, it’s a dereliction of duty.
@propublica.org org uncovered that a firm with deep personal and political ties to Secretary Noem’s inner circle quietly received hundreds of millions in DHS ad contracts tied to taxpayer-funded border messaging that bypassed normal competitive bidding. bit.ly/4rQG8jE
Shame on Secretary Noem. Instead of taking responsibility for agents under her leadership killing American citizens, she’s doubling down on false and inflammatory rhetoric. Leadership requires accountability, truth, and humility in the face of tragedy. The American people deserve far better.
Kristi Noem refuses to retract her statements that Renee Good and Alex Pretti were domestic terrorists
Only one in four Americans support these strikes.    The American people were promised a “President of Peace”. Instead, they’re getting unilateral escalation with no clear authorization, no defined strategy, and no public support.
Only one in four Americans approves of the US strikes that killed Iran's leader, while about half — including one in four Republicans — believe President Trump is too willing to use military force, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that concluded on Sunday reut.rs/4aSiAoF
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 10Next →