Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 366 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Just a day before our Senate hearing, yet another judge is ordering Trump to stop his illegal domestic deployments into our cities. Tomorrow, I look forward to grilling DoD on its justification for this egregious abuse of our heroes. Spoiler: there is none.
A federal judge orders Trump administration to end deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles.
Lies. China bought $1.4 billion in soybeans from Illinois alone last year. This year, due to Trump's policies, the U.S. is projected its lowest soybean exports to China since 2018—when Trump was also President. Don't let Trump gaslight you. He's always been bad for our farmers.
Leavitt: "President Trump convinced President Xi to continue purchasing again American soybeans, which is something China wasn't doing under the last administration because they had no respect for President Biden or the country at the time."
This week, the Senate will vote on Democrats' clean, three-year extension of the ACA tax credits. Republicans have a choice: stop health insurance premiums from skyrocketing or abandon their constituents.
Ensuring our troops have access to IVF is not a poison pill. Shame on Trump for standing by as Speaker Johnson stole IVF coverage away from our servicemembers for the second year in a row. He's no "father of IVF." He's a deadbeat dad who never keeps his promises.
NOTUS: Anti-Abortion Leaders Declare Victory Over Removal of IVF Provision in Defense Bill
Of course Trump would give the economy an A+ after he rigged it to enrich him, his family and billionaires... But for the rest of America?   Higher utility bills. Higher grocery bills. Historically high mortgage rates. And skyrocketing health insurance bills.
Trump is using your taxpayer dollars to fix a mess he created after his tariffs nearly put so many farmers out of business. And meanwhile, his tariffs are still inflating your grocery bills. The American people deserve better.
Breaking news: President Trump plans to announce a $12 billion relief assistance package for farmers, a key segment of his base, according to a White House official.
NEW: Next Thursday, on December 11, the Senate Armed Services Committee will finally hold a hearing on the cost that Trump’s military deployments have had on our cities, our civil rights and our servicemembers. The American people and our troops deserve answers.
A sickening mistake. Once again, RFK is proving he’s more interested in promoting pseudoscience than actually making Americans healthy again. And it'll be our kids who pay the price. The CDC must reverse this immediately.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s hand-picked vaccine committee voted on Friday to do away with the long-standing, universal recommendation that all babies receive a hepatitis B shot at birth, issuing weaker guidance for certain infants. Full details: cnb.cx/3XDcyR9
Hey Trump, are you really willing to let Mike Johnson stop you from keeping your promise to cover IVF for our military families? Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Screenshot of Senator Duckworth’s letter urging President Trump to call on Mike Johnson to support her NDAA amendment that would ensure servicemembers and their families have expanded access to IVF coverage. [1 of 2]
Screenshot of Senator Duckworth’s letter urging President Trump to call on Mike Johnson to support her NDAA amendment that would ensure servicemembers and their families have expanded access to IVF coverage. [2 of 2]
Donald Trump—if you are truly pro-IVF, then defend it for our heroes. Tell your Speaker of the House to fall in line and stop single-handedly trying to kill a provision that would cover IVF for military families. Enough promises. Let’s deliver. www.ms.now/news/mike-jo...
Dangerous, illegal and counterproductive. He’s dragging us into another war— With no regard for our troops, international law and the destabilizing impact to the region. Congress must rein in this President before it’s too late.
Trump: "We're doing start doing those strikes on land too. You know, the land is much easier."
Trump claims he's being "tough on drugs" when he's illegally striking boats— But he just pardoned a man convicted of helping traffic 400 tons of cocaine into our country. He can't have it both ways.
BREAKING: My bipartisan BABES Enhancement Act is now law! 👏 This law is about making it easier for parents to fly with breastmilk and breastfeeding supplies, ensuring TSA keeps its employees up to speed with its own policies and more. Huge win for families.
This Native American Heritage Day, we honor the hundreds of generations of Native peoples who called this land home long before we did. We celebrate their history, their culture and their leadership that continues to this day.
No matter how grim things can seem these days, there are always, always things to be thankful for. On my list is my family, good food and the big-hearted, resilient people of Illinois that I'm proud to serve. From my family to yours, have a happy Thanksgiving 🦃
We should never forget that our Guardsmen and women are our neighbors. Our troops always deserve our support—and my thoughts are with the National Guard community today and every day.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →