To the Latino community and all those who will now be targeted by Trump based on how they “look”—
We are with you. We will defend your rights.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois
Tammy Duckworth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 366 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
And so it begins.
This is not about law and order—if it was, Trump would coordinate with the city and police on public safety.
Instead, he's planning to invade, intimidate and stage chaos all so he can swoop in and play the hero.
Nothing about this is normal. NOTHING.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
"This is not the action of someone that's doing something legal or that they're proud of" -- Duckworth says the Trump administration locked the doors and "fled the base" when she and other Democrats went to visit Great Lakes Naval Base
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
Duckworth: "Let's make it clear -- the President of the United States essentially just declared war on a major city in his own nation. This is not normal. This is not acceptable behavior."
No Donald, Chicago is not your war zone
Instead of going after violent criminals, Trump is raiding workplaces and detaining hardworking people—including citizens.
And the message being sent to South Korea? That the U.S. is no place to do business.
He's hurting families, our economy and our alliances all in one swoop.
Take off that Cavalry hat, you draft dodger.
You didn’t earn the right to wear it.
Stolen valor at its worst.
I just visited Naval Station Great Lakes that Trump is letting DHS use as they prepare to invade Chicago.
The Navy cooperated and took the time to answer our questions.
Trump’s DHS locked the doors and fled.
That’s not how you act when you’re doing something legal.
Why stop there? Let’s rename all Depts after what Trump is inflicting on America.
Dept of HHS -> Dept of Hepatitis and Human Suffering
Dept of VA -> Dept of Veteran Abandonment
Dept of Education -> Dept of Erasure of History
Dept of Commerce -> Dept of Corruption
Just a start.
Republican cuts to Medicaid and SNAP won’t just hurt middle-class families—they’ll tank our economy.
Soon, we’ll lose:
➡️ 1.2 million jobs
➡️ $12.2 billion for state and local budgets
Plus, more expensive health care and food.
All for tax cuts billionaires don't need.
Trump confirmed it. Chicago is next.
And now, he plans to let his ICE agents operate out of Naval Station Great Lakes—where thousands of new recruits train every year.
@durbin.senate.gov and I are demanding a meeting with the Secretary of the Navy. Our troops deserve answers.
Give me a break.
If Trump really cared about law and order, he’d reinstate the millions he cut from crime prevention programs—instead of threatening our cities with military deployments that exploit our troops and undermine readiness.
Unions are the backbone of our economy. We should be doing all we can to lift them up—not ending collective bargaining for 1 million American workers like Trump did.
On Labor Day and always, Democrats will keep fighting for middle class families—not Mar-a-Lago billionaires.
SNAP was made permanent nearly 60 years ago today and it's helped millions of families put food on the table.
But Republicans would rather see billionaires put more money in the bank—so they gutted SNAP to fund tax cuts they don’t need.
They're betraying middle-class Americans.
A new level of cruel? Trump is illegally withholding child care grants for parents in college—
Forcing them into an impossible choice: drop out or take on more debt.
I’m demanding an investigation.
These funds that Congress already approved must be released immediately.
It's been 70 years since Emmett Till was lynched by white supremacists.
He was 14.
After years of pushing for it, the Chicago church where Emmett's mother bravely held his open-casket wake is a national monument.
May Emmett and Mamie Till-Mobley's stories never be forgotten.
No one should have to work nearly 8 extra months just to make as much as their white male counterparts do in a year—but that’s the reality Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander women face.
This NHPI Women’s Equal Pay Day, we renew the call: Equal work should always mean equal pay.
There’s a lot of uncertainty abroad about investing in America’s economy right now.
That's why last week I traveled to Japan and South Korea to keep reinforcing that Illinois is stronger than ever and primed for more investment.
Trump promised he would either pay for IVF or mandate insurance companies to cover it.
He could've achieved this by pushing Republicans to support my Right to IVF Act—but he didn't.
Instead of fulfilling his promise, he's sitting silent as Republicans push anti-IVF propaganda.
1.2 *million* Americans died from COVID before these vaccines were approved and we had widespread access to them.
Reducing access to vaccines that are effective and have saved so many lives isn’t simply anti-science, it’s anti-American.
And people could die because of it.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-14 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Bill Passed (84-16) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-40) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | S. 331 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-03-13 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-46) |
| 2025-03-12 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (78-19) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-03-11 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (67-32) |
| 2025-03-06 | S. 331 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-06 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-03-05 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-47) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 28 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-27) |
| 2025-03-04 | S.J. Res. 3 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-03 | S. 9 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-03-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-27 | H.J. Res. 35 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 12 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-26 | S.J. Res. 10 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52) |
| 2025-02-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-43) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (54-44) |
| 2025-02-25 | S.J. Res. 11 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42) |
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.