Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 366 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Donald Trump is thanking our Veterans for their service by eliminating their abortion care—even in cases of rape, incest or health concerns. Women servicemembers experience higher rates of sexual assault and fertility issues. This latest betrayal of our heroes must be reversed.
CQ: Senate Dems demand VA reverse ‘cruel’ abortion ban
It’s been 117 years since the NAACP was founded in the wake of the Springfield Race Riots, where Black Illinoisans lost their homes, businesses and lives. Out of tragedy came a new era of leadership. Because when Americans face oppression, we come together and demand better.
We can keep our communities safe without having masked federal agents terrorizing people and killing Americans in the street.   That's all Democrats are asking for.
Trump is yet again sacrificing our future to protect polluters' profits. He just decimated EPA's power to protect our planet and public health from climate change—and it will hit underserved communities hardest. He's lining billionaires' pockets, and we're paying the price.
AP: Trump’s EPA revokes scientific finding that underpinned US fight against climate change
Trump tried to weaponize our DOJ to go after his political critics. But Americans on jury duty stood up and upheld our Constitution when their own President wouldn’t. Senators Kelly and Slotkin are American patriots. Unlike those who put retribution before the rule of law.
Alex Pretti. Renee Good. Keith Porter. Silverio Villegas González. One life taken by Trump's violent, masked secret police is too many. Republicans need to come to the table and help us rein them in.
Masked federal agents are gunning down American citizens in cold blood. Kristi Noem is threatening the watchdog that’s supposed to investigate this Administration's abuse. Things need to change. Fast. Democrats are fighting to rein in Trump's DHS.
DHS IG denied my request for more coordinated investigations into Trump’s lawless agents. Then, I learned Kristi Noem repeatedly reminded DHS’s IG that she can unilaterally kill any investigation. Why would she do that? 🤔 Feels like a threat to me.
NBC News: DHS warned its independent watchdog that Noem can kill its investigations, senator says
A Border Patrol agent shot her five times—then bragged about it to his buddies.   Today, a federal court ruled those texts must be released.   The American people deserve transparency just as much as Marimar deserves justice.
There is no excuse. We have seen these vile, hateful depictions before. We know its intent. This blatant racism toward former President and First Lady Obama has no place in America. Trump is a national embarrassment to our country.
President Trump posted a video including imagery depicting former President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama as apes.
ICE investigators were supposed to investigate the killing of Alex Pretti. Instead, they investigated Alex. Not his killers. With FBI now leading this probe, I’m calling on Kristi Noem and Kash Patel: Remove all ICE agents from this investigation completely.
Duckworth’s letter to Noem and Patel.
All we’re asking Trump to do is finally start delivering on his campaign promise for free IVF. Our federal workers deserve the same level of coverage as Members of Congress. This should be a no-brainer.
Duckworth and Walkinshaw’s letter to OPM (1 of 3)
Duckworth and Walkinshaw’s letter to OPM (2 of 3)
Duckworth and Walkinshaw’s letter to OPM (3 of 3)
History has proven that freedom isn’t guaranteed. It’s fought for. This Black History Month reminds us we stand on the shoulders of civil rights leaders who peacefully protested, marched and demanded better from our government. We won't let a wanna-be king trample our rights.
All Americans expect and deserve a government that tells the truth and doesn’t murder its own citizens.   Over the next two weeks, Republicans must prioritize the safety of the American people above all else.   This reign of terror from DHS, Border Patrol and ICE cannot continue.
Democrats are demanding three very reasonable safeguards to protect the American people:   Get Border Patrol out of our cities. Independent investigations. No masks and more body cams.
Trump's IRS lawsuit is demanding $10 billion from taxpayers. $10 billion would pay for 4 months of ACA tax credits for millions who can't afford health care—because of him. In Trump's ideal world, you make him richer. While he makes you sicker and poorer.
Trump's ICE snatched this bright, happy 5-year-old from his driveway. They shipped him 1,300 miles to suffer, without his mother, in a squalid Texas detention center. And now he's growing ill. Democrats are fighting to end this cruelty. Liam is not a criminal. Let him go.
Photo of Liam Ramos being snatched from his driveway by ICE agents
Photo of Liam Ramos sick in ICE detention
Trump’s illegal domestic deployments cost taxpayers $496 million—and counting. Including $21 million in Illinois. There’s no money for health care. But half a billion to waste on intimidating Americans in their own communities.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →