The 1st Amendment guarantees a right to free speech, not just speech you agree with. Mahmoud Khalil is a legal resident and deporting him because the admin doesn’t like what he said without any due process, is a blatant shredding of our Constitution. This is a dangerous precedent.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Oregon District 4
Val T. Hoyle
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 517
Yes41%
No56%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Val T. Hoyle
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratOregon District 4
SoupScore
Val T.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 56 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Today, I joined over 150 of my Dem colleagues to call out Pres Trump's firing of the USPS Board of Governors. The USPS is often the only carrier that delivers vital supplies, like meds, to our rural areas. We should be investing in the USPS, not finding ways to remove its independence & shutter it.
The Congressional Art Competition is underway! Enter now for a chance to win an all expenses paid trip to Washington D.C. & to have your artwork displayed in the U.S. Capitol for a year! More info about the competition and how to apply can be found at the link below!
hoyle.house.gov/congressiona...
Hey, that was fun - let's do it again! On Friday, we had over 6,200 Oregonians from the 4th District call in. In response, my team & I will host ANOTHER tele-townhall this MONDAY at 5:30PM. We will be joined by OR Attorney General @danrayfield.bsky.social!! Fill out the form below to join us!
This International Women’s Day, we remember that while today women voting, having credit cards, or holding a job is normal – it was once a radical idea. The achievements of the women's movement show us that progress is possible, but the state of the country makes clear that we have to keep fighting.
Summer internship applications are now open for our D.C. and Eugene offices, click the link below for more information on requirements, dates, and how to apply! Please make sure to follow all posted instructions.
hoyle.house.gov/services/int...
Reposted byRepresentative Val Hoyle
👋Fellow Democrats, the party needs to rethink all the anti-tariff absolutism. I’m a Rust Belt Democrat from swingy Western PA—where lousy trade deals like NAFTA stripped us for parts. Democrats need to break free from the zombie horde of neoliberal economists who think tariffs are always bad. 🧵
Hey Oregon’s 4th District! I am holding a telephone townhall with
@oregonsos.bsky.social TOMORROW NIGHT, March 7th at 5:30pm. Make sure you sign up at the link below so I give you a call. Talk soon!
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
If you actually stood for veterans, you would NEVER gut the VA and try to privatize it. You would never attach a profit motive to caring for our wounded men and women in uniform. You would do everything and anything to give the VA all that they need to help our heroes.
BREAKING: Internal memo reveals that the Trump administration plans to cut over 80,000 workers from Veterans Affairs.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
What happened tonight made it clear where Donald Trump plans to take this country, but we don't have to go along with it. As a third-generation union member, I can tell you that right now isn’t the time to sit back. We organize and we speak out.
As he rambles, don't forget one simple fact: When Trump took office, our economy was estimated to grow by nearly 4% this year. Today, it is expected to get 2.8% SMALLER. Our economic outlook has shrunk nearly 7% in 42 DAYS
Eggs? More expensive. Gas prices? Rising.
🚨 “The agriculture industry lost $26 BILLION from retaliatory tariffs in 2018 and 2019 — the first time Trump launched a trade war”
Our farmers have barely recovered from Trump’s first term tariffs. Now he is doing it again, the same exact way, but magically expects this time to be different.
Let’s be clear: tariffs are not inherently bad; tariffs are PART of the solution to help domestic manufacturing. Tariffs paired with DOMESTIC INVESTMENT, in the sectors which the tariffs target, can spur domestic growth. Without that, they raise prices, screw workers & hurt American consumers.
If President Trump and House Republicans want to find fraud in Medicaid or Medicare, they shouldn’t start with working people or seniors, they should start with providers who rip off the government for their gain. You know, the kind FL Senator Rick Scott’s company was fined $1.6 BILLION for.
If President Trump wants to address fraud, he’d look at the billions in subsidies we give to big oil, or big pharma, or airlines, or the banks. Working people, who are overwhelmingly honest and hardworking, shouldn’t have their pockets picked until the fat cats get theirs checked first.
Whenever you hear them talk about ‘government efficiency’ remember that so far they have refused to invest a single dollar into updating the computers, systems, and infrastructure at agencies like the IRS and SSA. You know improvements that would actually help us DELIVER SERVICES faster.
Elon Musk and House Republicans want you to think that everything they cut is just a salary, a random program or a number on a spreadsheet. But these are essential programs and public servants our communities rely on. If you or someone you know has been impacted, please speak out & share your story!
Calling veterans lazy?! These people have no shame. How low do you have to go before you admit you made a mistake?
You can’t say you respect our veterans while saying they aren’t worthy of a job. These people literally put their lives on the line to protect and serve our country.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History517 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
517 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H.R. 1223 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-20 | H. Res. 426 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1286 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-19 | H.R. 1263 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2240 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-15 | H.R. 2255 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 352 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2243 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H. Res. 405 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-14 | H.R. 2215 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H.R. 249 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-13 | H. Con. Res. 30 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-08 | H.R. 276 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 881 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-07 | H.R. 1503 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-06 | H. Res. 377 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.