After a year of progress, Ms. Neal is unable to complete her Medicare renewal because Social Security cannot respond to congressional inquiries during a shutdown.
Ms. Neal said it best: shame on Republicans for refusing to reopen the government and protect health care.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 37
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 535
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 37
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Sydney Kamlager-Dove
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 37
SoupScore
Sydney's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 121 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump is planning to illegally withhold food assistance from those in need, including 50,000 households in my district.
Choosing to let Americans go hungry while you build yourself a $350 million ballroom is a distortion of values.
Seven years ago today, 11 Jewish people were murdered at Tree of Life in Pittsburgh.
As we remember the innocent souls lost, we recommit to combating the antisemitism, anti-immigrant hate, & white supremacy that motivated this horrific attack.
May their memories be a blessing.
Glad that @governor.ca.gov signed Wakiesha's Law in California after years of advocacy by her family. No family's pain should be compounded by the delayed notification of the death of a loved one.
Let's pass my bill to ensure this is law nationwide.
Trump’s assaults on blue cities are hurting small businesses and our local economies.
As if Trump’s economy wasn’t bad enough already.
The White House might be happy with increasing inflation, but the American people sure aren't.
Donald Trump is more interested in prosecuting Democrats than working with us to save health care and open the government.
I just returned to my district from Chicago, where I heard firsthand about Trump’s assault on the Windy City.
Tune in to @msnbc.com at 1PM ET/10AM PT as I break down what we learned on Alex Witt Reports.
Trump pledged he wouldn't touch the East Wing—now he's torn it all down, like he's torn apart our Constitution.
He also promised that his $350 million ballroom wouldn't cost taxpayers a cent. We need to know if he's lying about that too.
As a daughter of Chicago, I was proud to see the strength of the Windy City on display today at our shadow hearing on Trump's assault on Chicago.
I brought a message from my recently-freed constituent Enrique in Culver City: keep fighting. LA is with you, Chicago.
Still in the Trump Administration. Still a self-described Nazi.
This is not enough. He must be fired.
The party of "fiscal responsibility" says Donald Trump is entitled to $230 million in taxpayer dollars for his petty perceived grievances—but there's no money for you to get affordable health care.
The Republican health care crisis is placing our health centers under attack.
I visited Universal Community Health Center in South LA to see how Republicans' Medicaid cuts & premium hikes are impacting them.
I’ll keep fighting for community health centers—lives depend on it.
My friend @replamonica.bsky.social was doing her job by conducting oversight. The Trump Administration wants to escape accountability, so they're trying to silence her by prosecuting her.
Their authoritarian tactics cannot stand. I'm ten toes down behind Rep. McIver.
I am calling for a full investigation—including the immediate release of all body and dash camera footage. Transparency is essential to rebuilding trust and keeping our community safe. (🧵2/2)
I am closely monitoring the situation in my district involving the shooting of a community member and a U.S. Marshal. While the full details are still emerging, I am deeply concerned about a pattern of immigration operations getting increasingly violent. (🧵1/2)
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History535 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
535 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 1949 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.