I joined my colleagues @dorismatsui.bsky.social & @repjimcosta.bsky.social in demanding that the National Weather Service (@nws.noaa.gov) Sacramento and Hanford offices return to their full capacity.
Staffing cuts puts constituents directly at risk; it is irresponsible & immoral.
bit.ly/4ktaZPI
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 18
Zoe Lofgren
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes43%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 18
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Zoe Lofgren
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 18
SoupScore
Zoe's ATmosphere Activity
17 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 124 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Hazard mitigation saves lives & saves money for the government in the long run by preventing disasters.
My colleagues across the aisle and in the Senate agree.
@usrepjimmypanetta.bsky.social @padilla.senate.gov @schiff.senate.gov, Rep. David Valadao
bit.ly/4dGsR74
‼️Was your grant canceled by President Trump? Democrats on the Science Committee want to hear from you.
To better understand the impact of Trump's assault on science, House Science Dems have launched a submission form for individuals to share their experience.
bit.ly/4kfc9hk
ICYMI – I joined @lastword.msnbc.com to discuss the limits on judicial power of contempt in the GOP Budget Bill.
Preventing the Trump Administration from being held accountable for violating court orders is despicable.
Watch here ⤵️
youtu.be/mQ2MxaxPwxw
The GOP’s budget proposal puts billionaires above everyday families. Republicans have a choice: stop these devastating cuts or fail the people they claim to serve.
Clean air & water protections will be cut, public lands will be sold off, & clean manufacturing investments will be slashed.
This GOP tax scam will add trillions to the debt, fuel inflation, & jeopardize the economy – all to bankroll tax cuts for the ultra-rich.
Nearly 14 million people will lose their health care. Seniors, children, veterans, & people with disabilities would be adversely impacted.
Millions of people will lose their SNAP benefits – some families will struggle to keep food on the table.
The GOP budget proposal is a scam that will hurt everyday Americans.
🧵Here’s why:
House Democrats will never be intimidated by Trump or his lackeys.
All Members of Congress swear an oath to uphold the Constitution – which includes conducting oversight of the Executive Branch.
The charges brought against Rep. McIver are an attempt by the Trump Administration to interfere with this Constitutional responsibility.
In CA alone, over 5 million people, including over 100 thousand veterans & 1.5 million children, receive SNAP benefits to help put food on the table.
Republican proposals to cut SNAP funding would hurt our families, our veterans, & our economy.
Yesterday, I spoke with Western Growers, who represent some of the men & women who work America’s farms to feed this nation.
As economic chaos and confusion continues, it is essential we provide stability to this critical workforce.
Read more: lofgren.house.gov/media/press-...
Hospital associations are agreed; this would be disastrous for our mothers & our rural communities: www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/hospita...
I met with the RCRC & Supervisor Lopez about how essential Medicaid is for Labor & Delivery & rural healthcare.
Republicans’ proposed Medicaid cuts would increase the number of people without health insurance by at least 8.6 million.
Today, with my colleagues, Reps. Dan Newhouse, Mike Simpson, Jim Costa, David Valadao, & Adam Gray, I reintroduced the Farm Workforce Modernization Act.
As labor shortages contribute to high food prices, it is even more essential that we stabilize our country’s workforce.
Read more: bit.ly/434WcTL
← Newer postsPosts page 34
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-04 | H.J. Res. 142 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-04 | H.R. 4090 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H. Res. 1032 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-03 | H.R. 3123 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-02-02 | H.R. 980 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Con. Res. 68 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 6359 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7148 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-22 | H.R. 7147 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-22 | H. Res. 1014 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.J. Res. 140 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 6945 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H. Res. 1009 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-21 | H.R. 5764 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-20 | H.R. 5763 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-15 | H.R. 2988 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H.R. 7006 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.