There has been no clear evidence from the intelligence community that Iran presented an imminent threat to the United States.
The Trump Administration is spending roughly $1 billion dollars a day in this conflict, funding which could have been used here at home.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Massachusetts District 8
Stephen F. Lynch
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 592
Yes43%
No52%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align96%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 8
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Stephen F. Lynch
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratMassachusetts District 8
SoupScore
Stephen F.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 168 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
MA-08 residents in the Middle East: please know my office is here to help you. Please follow the steps above and call my office at 617-428-2000.
At Oversight Committee today, I voted YES on a motion to subpoena Attorney General Bondi that passed and will force her to answer our questions about the Department of Justice’s mishandling of the Epstein case.
After promising the American people that the Epstein files were sitting on her desk more than one year ago, Attorney General Pam Bondi has done nothing but delay and obstruct our bipartisan oversight investigation into the heinous crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.
It was great to meet with 30 high school students from Oliver Ames High School this afternoon.
We had a great discussion on the steps of the Capitol to talk about current events, my role as their Federal Representative, and to answer their insightful questions.
Our future is bright!
Representative Stephen Lynch ‘100 percent in support’ of Foxborough in its struggle to receive World Cup security funds
www.bostonglobe.com/2026/03/03/s...
We need to be thorough and ensure that anyone who may have had any information or access to Epstein’s horrific crimes is brought in for questioning, including President Trump.
The survivors deserve justice.
We don’t have any choice; there needs to be major changes before we provide any funding to DHS.
President Trump violated federal law when he unilaterally imposed tariffs worldwide.
It is reassuring that six Supreme Court justices said NO and held this Administration accountable to the rule of law.
Great turnout at the Quincy Asian Resources Lunar New Year celebration - sincere thanks to Philip Chong, Lisa Hsu, Mayor Koch, and Senator John Keenan for a wonderful family-friendly event.
Best wishes for a safe and prosperous Year of the Horse!
Today, I joined my fellow Oversight Committee Democrats in Ohio for a deposition to question billionaire Les Wexner about his strong ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
It was Wexner who gave Epstein the financial capacity to commit many abuses while he was in a position to stop many of these crimes.
Today, I testified at the Massachusetts State House to voice my support and urge state legislators to reopen Norwood Hospital as a nonprofit healthcare facility by taking the property by eminent domain.
youtube.com/shorts/OTmPp...
We prayed for the @patriots.bsky.social again this week in Church - wishing them a Super Bowl Victory!
We all we Got - We all we need! Go Pats! 🏈
ICYMI - @pressley.house.gov and Stephen Lynch draw a line on Epstein
www.bostonglobe.com/2026/02/04/o...
Reposted byCongressman Stephen F. Lynch
Today is #ThankAMailCarrierDay 📫
Rain, snow, or shine, mail carriers connect our communities across every corner of the country.
To the dedicated professionals who keep our world moving, one delivery at a time, thank you for all that you do!
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History592 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
592 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-22 | H.R. 4690 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1182 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-22 | H. Res. 1189 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | S. 1020 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 2493 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-21 | H.R. 5201 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 5200 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-20 | H.R. 1681 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-17 | H. Res. 1175 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 1156 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 1689 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6398 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-16 | H.R. 6409 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-16 | H. Con. Res. 40 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 965 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-15 | H. Res. 1174 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 7613 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-04-14 | H.R. 1011 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | H. Res. 1142 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-28 | — | Motion to Adjourn | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-27 | H.R. 7084 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-26 | H.R. 8029 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-26 | H. Res. 1128 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H.R. 5103 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-25 | H. Res. 1131 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-24 | H.R. 6422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-19 | H.R. 4638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.J. Res. 139 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 1958 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-18 | H.R. 556 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | Approve resolution | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H. Res. 1115 (119th) | End debate now | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | S. 3971 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-17 | H.R. 4294 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-03-05 | H.R. 7744 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Con. Res. 38 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-03-05 | H. Res. 1099 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.