Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byMike Levin
The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump to dismantle the Department of Education with the stroke of a pen. As a parent with two kids in public school, I believe that should concern every American—no matter your politics. 🧵👇🏻
Trump just got the green light to gut the Department of Education with zero input from Congress. That means fewer protections for kids with disabilities, less support for local schools, and more power in the hands of one man. We should move the next generation forward, not backward.
Cutting 30,000 VA jobs while vets wait longer for care is a disgrace. Nurses doing admin work, claims delayed, hospitals understaffed—this isn’t saving money, it’s failing those who served. Veterans deserve better. America should do better.
Trump’s tariffs are a tax on the American people. They raise prices on everything from food to medicine, hurt our farmers and manufacturers, and put jobs at risk. This isn’t tough negotiating. It is economic sabotage that hits working families the hardest. www.cnbc.com/2025/07/12/t...
Congress must reassert its authority. One we lose oversight, we don’t get it back. Let’s protect our kids, our schools, and our Constitution—before it’s too late.
This is demolition without any sort of discussion. And it sets a dangerous precedent. If one president can dismantle entire agencies they don’t like, what’s next?
That means decisions that should involve parents, teachers, and local leaders are now made by bureaucrats in Washington. We can debate the size and role of the Department of Education, and we should. But this isn’t debate.
This ruling gives the executive branch the power to gut entire departments by simply firing the people who make them work. Right now, that means laying off thousands of staff at the Department of Education, or freezing funding for local school programs that help families.
This isn’t about whether you love or hate Washington. For decades, we’ve had checks and balances to make sure no president could unilaterally tear down the institutions that serve our communities. Today, that protection is gone.
The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump to dismantle the Department of Education with the stroke of a pen. As a parent with two kids in public school, I believe that should concern every American—no matter your politics. 🧵👇🏻
This is your daily reminder: Republicans gutted Medicaid, Medicare & SNAP to fund massive tax breaks for billionaires. The worst impacts are delayed—but that’s intentional. The pain comes later to dodge accountability, but we won’t forget.
Stephen Miller has spent his career pushing policies that treat people as threats instead of humans. His ideas don’t come from strength or compassion but from a deep belief in exclusion. We need leaders who solve problems, not ones who divide to score points. www.nytimes.com/2025/07/07/o...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 11Next →