Mike Levin headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 49
Born
October 28, 1978
Age 47
Phone
(202) 225-3906
Office
2352 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49

Mike Levin

Michael Ted Levin is an American politician and attorney who serves as the U.S. representative for California's 49th congressional district since 2019. He is a member of the Democratic Party and represents most of San Diego's North County, as well as part of southern Orange County.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 49

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mike Levin headshot
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Threatening Greenland strains our alliances and makes the world less stable. Trump is now refusing to rule out military force against a treaty ally, an extraordinary and dangerous step that pulls focus and resources away from the problems Americans actually face.
Reposted byMike Levin
We need to end lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court. For a court that shapes our rights for generations, concentrating power indefinitely undermines public trust. I’m backing legislation for 18-year term limits and regular appointments to restore balance and accountability.
No fake website can undo sworn testimony or video evidence. As Leader Jeffries said, “Donald Trump may have pardoned your crimes, but only God can pardon your sin.”
This nonsense revisionist history doesn’t change the fact that a violent mob attacked the U.S. Capitol to stop a lawful election, injured officers, threatened lawmakers, and came within moments of far worse but for the bravery of law enforcement.
We need to end lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court. For a court that shapes our rights for generations, concentrating power indefinitely undermines public trust. I’m backing legislation for 18-year term limits and regular appointments to restore balance and accountability.
Let me get this straight: the Trump Administration is “running” Venezuela while millions of Americans are facing higher health care costs and losing coverage at home. How is that America First?
It’s been 5 years since the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. I remain in disbelief that this Congress still has not found the political will to do something as basic and decent as installing the plaque to honor the officers who protected us.
Five years ago, I started the morning of January 6, 2021, in my Washington office like any other workday. I had been sworn in just days earlier to the 117th Congress. I was preparing to do one of the most basic jobs required of a Member of Congress:
Reposted byMike Levin
Pete Hegseth’s decision to move to strip Mark Kelly of his military retirement pay is an abuse of power, plain and simple. Senator Kelly is a decorated Navy combat pilot, a retired captain, and an American astronaut who has spent his life serving this country.
Smearing a retired officer’s military record because he exercised his First Amendment rights and defended the rule of law is fundamentally un-American. It sends a chilling message to every current and former service member: speak up against illegal conduct, and you will be targeted.
Pete Hegseth’s decision to move to strip Mark Kelly of his military retirement pay is an abuse of power, plain and simple. Senator Kelly is a decorated Navy combat pilot, a retired captain, and an American astronaut who has spent his life serving this country.
Asked if there would be “boots on the ground” in Venezuela, the President said yes—for oil. We’ve seen this movie before, and it doesn’t end well.
There's no question that Nicolas Maduro ruled Venezuela through repression, corruption, and the systematic dismantling of democratic institutions. Venezuelans have paid the price. Their country is better off without him. But even when confronting a dictator, the US remains bound by its Constitution.
Reposted byMike Levin
Every new year is a chance to step back and ask where America is headed—and what kind of future we’re leaving our kids. That’s why I serve in Congress: to do my part to leave something better behind, and to serve a cause greater than self.
Towards that end, I’ve laid out TEN BIG STEPS to lower costs, improve quality of life, and restore common ground. They’re not partisan. They’re practical. I’ll work with anyone—Democrat, Republican, or Independent—who’s serious about results. I hope you’ll take a minute to read them.
Every new year is a chance to step back and ask where America is headed—and what kind of future we’re leaving our kids. That’s why I serve in Congress: to do my part to leave something better behind, and to serve a cause greater than self.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
550 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-17S. 1582 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H.R. 3633 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-07-17H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-16H. Res. 580 (119th)Motion to ReconsiderNONOPassed
2025-07-15H.R. 1717 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-07-15H. Res. 580 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-14S. 1596 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1770 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-14H.R. 1709 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-07-03H.R. 1 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-07-03H. Res. 566 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageYESNOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 11Next →