The irony is that Elon Musk’s new X policy exposed the truth. And the truth is simple. We have far more in common with our fellow Americans than with anyone trying to divide us for profit or politics.
Democracy survives only if we remember that. www.the-independent.com/news/world/a...
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 49
Mike Levin
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 550
Yes45%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 49
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Mike Levin
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 49
SoupScore
Mike's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 24 sponsored · 93 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Yes, Americans argue and always have. Honest debate is woven into who we are.
But the outrage these accounts pump into our feeds isn’t debate.
It is manipulation built to spark fear, pit neighbor against neighbor, and weaken our country from within.
This weekend confirmed what many suspected.
Some of the loudest MAGA voices on X aren’t even American.
They’re foreign operators posing as us to fracture our democracy. 🧵👇
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump wants to bring offshore drilling back to California for the first time in decades.
Absolutely not.
This plan is economic nonsense and environmental malpractice. California has said hell no before, and we will say hell no again.
Our coast is not for sale, not to Trump and not to Big Oil.
And for what?
A tiny amount of oil that wouldn’t meaningfully lower prices or move the needle on energy security.
Our coastal economy (tourism, recreation, small businesses, fishing, etc.) depends on clean water and healthy beaches.
One spill (and it is a matter of when, not if, there eventually would be a spill) would potentially do billions in damage and wipe out livelihoods up and down the coast.
Trump wants to bring offshore drilling back to California for the first time in decades.
Absolutely not.
And the moral case is just as clear. A sovereign democracy was invaded by an authoritarian who believes he can rewrite borders by force. Standing with Ukraine defends our values, protects our allies, and helps prevent a far more dangerous fight for our own service members.
I said it over a year ago: Trump’s plan was always to sell out Zelensky and hand Putin exactly what he wants.
We cannot allow it to happen.
If Putin were to push toward NATO countries, our treaty obligations could put American service members directly in harm’s way.
Reposted byMike Levin
Reposted byMike Levin
Now Trump wants to let Big Oil start drilling off California’s coastline.
And for what?
It won’t lower gas prices. Not now, not ever.
Even the oil companies admit it would take a decade to produce anything meaningful, and even then it would barely move national supply.
I’ll fight any attempt to drill off our shores, and I’ll stand with every Californian who knows our ocean isn’t for sale.
Billions of tons of new carbon pollution isn’t just bad policy, it’s utter madness for a state already battling wildfires, extreme heat, and rising seas.
Only the fossil fuel industry thinks doubling down on this makes sense. Even most local Republicans don’t want offshore drilling in California.
Meanwhile, our coastal economy (tourism, fishing, recreation) brings in tens of BILLIONS every year. Trump’s plan risks all of that for a payday that won’t even show up on a gas receipt.
And let’s not forget the climate math.
California drivers would feel nothing. But our coastline would feel everything. One spill could shut down beaches, kill wildlife, and hammer small businesses. We already lived through this in 2021 in Orange County when a relatively small spill caused chaos.
Now Trump wants to let Big Oil start drilling off California’s coastline.
And for what?
It won’t lower gas prices. Not now, not ever.
Even the oil companies admit it would take a decade to produce anything meaningful, and even then it would barely move national supply.
Reposted byMike Levin
Trump keeps propping up expensive, unreliable coal plants and your energy bills keep rising.
Cheap energy is clean energy. Trump’s fossil fuel obsession makes families pay more. www.lcv.org/blog/how-tru...
Trump keeps propping up expensive, unreliable coal plants and your energy bills keep rising.
Cheap energy is clean energy. Trump’s fossil fuel obsession makes families pay more. www.lcv.org/blog/how-tru...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History550 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
550 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.