Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 203 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Trump tariff strategy
The markets sure are feeling liberated…. from stability.
Myself and too many of my constituents know what it's like to struggle to keep the heat on and paid for in the winter.
Cutting the staff that help keep the heat on for families in need in the Wisconsin cold is not just cruel, it is risking lives.
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/02/c...
Tariffs are a legitimate policy tool when designed to support American industries and workers.
But Trump's haphazard approach is escalating tensions with our trading partners, risking raised prices.
The last thing Americans need is more economic uncertainty under Donald Trump.
I joined my colleagues in a meeting with Department of Education Secretary McMahon this morning to remind her that the agencies can only be created or closed by Congress.
We must retain federal oversight to ensures equal access and protects students' rights.
Wearing red shoes every day because I’m on fire!
My brother in arms, Senator Cory Booker stands tall on the Senate floor as a fierce defender of Americans against the reckless chaos being imposed by Donald Trump and his unelected billionaire lackey Elon Musk.
Former SSA Commissioner O’Malley is exactly right.
What’s happened now in 60 days is Elon Musk has poured fuel on the fire to cut staff, close field offices, and make it harder for people to access their earned Social Security benefits.
Freudian slip or rare moment of honesty from the GOP?
They are openly plotting to cut Medicare, leaving aging Americans to fend for themselves.
This is what “America First” really looks like—cruelty and neglect.
Trump’s ruthless cuts are dismantling the social safety net, leaving everyday people without support — all while pushing for tax giveaways for billionaires and corporations.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/h...
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
Get me to God's country
Trump sold his economic plan to the American people as one that would lower costs and inflation.
Instead, his hairbrained flip-flopping economic policies are doing the exact opposite.
He is breaking his campaign promises and leaving working Americans to pay the price.
Republicans are breaking the promise America made to take care of our veterans.
The men and women who served our country and defended our democracy deserve to talk to a real person about their VA care and benefits.
www.cnn.com/2025/03/28/p...
🚨"Farmers in Trump country were counting on clean energy grants. Then the government moved the goalposts."
Let's be very clear: Donald Trump is fine with hurting farmers by pushing policies that favor Big Oil over rural livelihoods.
wisconsinwatch.org/2025/03/farm...
The tax code should reward hard work, not just wealth. The EITC helps working families get ahead, but too many workers are left behind. My bill, the #WRCRAct, would create a fairer tax system—one that values labor, including unpaid labor, over tax breaks for the rich.
Speaking up WORKS. We must keep the pressure on.
Keep making your voices heard, and I promise I will never stop speaking up for my constituents, and Americans in every zip code, who would suffer if they could not access their Social Security benefits.
www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...
For half a century, the EITC has been a lifeline for hardworking Americans, lifting millions out of poverty and rewarding work.
I’m fighting to protect and expand the EITC because the tax code should work for Americans building a better life — not just the wealthy few.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.