
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Wisconsin District 4
Gwen Moore
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 534
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 4
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gwen Moore
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratWisconsin District 4
SoupScore
Gwen's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 29 sponsored · 204 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Disconnected from legitimate trade policy, Donald Trump's tariffs lack a real plan to help Americans.
🚨🚨"The cost of owning a car could see a steep increase if President Donald Trump imposes significant tariffs on countries like Canada and Mexico"
www.newsweek.com/trump-tariff...
If Republicans were serious about lowering costs on goods Americans need every day, they wouldn’t be imposing across the board tariffs on nearly every product from our closest trading partners.
The Trump Trade War 2.0 is here.
www.wsj.com/politics/ele...
TODAY: Trump is promising to implement sweeping tariffs.
Putting your hands over your eyes when playing darts and hoping you hit the bullseye is not sound economic policy.
www.reuters.com/business/tru...
Last night Donald Trump had pink slips given to patriotic FBI agents who did their duty and investigated the deadly January 6th insurrection.
It’s clear where the Republican Party stands, and it’s not with law and order.
Unelected billionaire Elon Musk continues to expand his power grab, and this time he wants Americans’ most sensitive information, including their Social Security numbers and banking information.
We should all be asking why he wants it…..
www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Trump tariffs are bad for the economy.
Just ask farmers, factory workers, and small businesses who were crushed by rising costs and lost markets in Trump's Trade War 1.0.
www.reuters.com/world/americ...
This national tragedy is a reminder that Donald Trump is incapable of offering real leadership. Even as Trump gutted aviation safety staff, he still deflects and scapegoats others.
www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Trump has no clue what caused this horrific tragedy but that doesn’t stop him from blaming his favorite boogeyman - people of color.
He’d rather distract from his actions than mention that he slashed FAA and aviation safety personnel and boards.
Trump doesn't care about the rule of law. He cares about loyalty and nothing else.
And that’s what Kash Patel represents.
I am praying for everyone affected by the tragic accident near Washington, D.C.. My heart is with the passengers and their families.
Folks, here’s the truth: Republicans are going to try to make devastating cuts to programs vulnerable Americans rely on one way or another.
Weeds always find the cracks in the sidewalk.
So Democrats will remain vigilant, outspoken, and stand ready.
Reposted byCongresswoman Gwen Moore
The Fed is halting rate cuts as inflation looks more persistent, with some officials worried Trump's economic agenda might further ignite price pressures.
While House Republicans rushed to bend to Trump’s will when he pushed an illegal federal funding freeze, Democrats stood up for the American people and the rule of law.
We won’t roll over.
I’m aware of reports of the illegal detainment of American citizens by ICE in Milwaukee.
This is what Trump wants — to sow fear amongst communities who have certain names, certain complexions or speak certain languages.
If you are detained by ICE:
🚨🚨 “U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore called the measure "draconian" and said the consequences of the funding freeze would not be limited to Democratic cities like Milwaukee.”
Every zip code in America will be negatively impacted if Trump gets his way.
www.jsonline.com/story/news/p...
Day 8: Republicans are at Trump’s golf course plotting tax cuts for billionaires.
Meanwhile, eggs are only affordable to those who could buy a front row ticket to the inauguration.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History534 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
534 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-15 | S. 284 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-12 | H.R. 3668 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 2550 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3898 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3383 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3638 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H.R. 3628 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-11 | H. Res. 939 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 432 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | S. 1071 (119th) | Motion to Commit | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H. Res. 936 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-10 | H.R. 1676 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-09 | S. 356 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1049 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-04 | H.R. 1069 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 1005 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 4305 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-03 | H.R. 2965 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H. Res. 916 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-02 | H.R. 4423 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-01 | H.R. 5348 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 3109 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H. Res. 893 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 6019 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 4058 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5107 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-20 | H.R. 5214 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-19 | S.J. Res. 80 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 131 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-19 | H.J. Res. 130 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 888 (119th) | Motion to Refer | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 879 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 4405 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-18 | H. Res. 878 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-11-18 | H.R. 2659 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-11-17 | H.R. 1608 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.